I was home today, and got to watch question period. Interesting to say the least.
What are the Liberals trying to hide with their fake outrage about an article in the Vancouver sun?
Navdeep Singh Bains, MP for Mississauga-Brampton South, shot on to the national stage after the December 2006 convention in which he delivered huge support to Gerard Kennedy and later to Dion, who won the Liberal leadership by 437 votes.
The Vancouver Sun has learned that Bains's father-in-law, Darshan Singh Saini, is on the RCMP's potential list of witnesses at investigative hearings designed to advance the Air India criminal probe.
But the ability to hold those hearings will be lost March 1 if parts of the Anti-Terrorism Act expire as expected, after the Liberals recently withdrew support for extending the provision being used to hold them.
So, if parts of the Anti-Terrorism Act are not supported by the Liberals, no witnesses, no hearings? Hummm.
Here's what we have so far:
1. Liberal MP Bains father-in-law, might have to testify in the Air India Inquiry, if the Anti-Terrorism Act is not shot down.
2. Ex-PM Paul Martin, was actively asking forsupport from terrorist organizations.
3. Then interim leader Bill Graham, seems soft on Hizbullah.
4. Ex-PM Paul Martin and friends, show support for the Tamil Tigers.
5. Let's not forget Denis Coderre, marching in Montreal, in a pro-Hezbollah march, with flags showing support for the terrorist group.
6. How about Bob Rae's wife being subjected to anti-semitic remarks, at the Liberal leadership convention.
Anyone seeing a pattern developing here? Maybe the Liberals are protesting just a tad too much. If the Liberals do not support the anti-terrorism act, will anyone actually wonder why?
PM Harper didn't have to smear anyone, the Liberals did a great job all by themselves. And, they will have to wear it next election.
1 comment:
I agree. Their self-righteous indignation is wearing a little thin.
Post a Comment