Obama and Israel?

Well fluke (HA) warm is how I would describe Obama's position on Israel. I wonder if he gets tired of tiptoeing around all day trying to avoid anyone who might want him to take a stand on an issue? He might be a nice person, but he is a pi$$ poor administrator. He bows to Saudi kings but wants Israel to give back land that would insure that Israel would get destroyed.

Seeing as the left always brings out the big Hollywood stars to agree with their position, like McCartney on our seal hunt. I figure it's only fair that we bring out some big guns (lefties quaking in their boots at the mere mention of guns) to get in Obama's face.

Language aside, he's right. The UN is garbage infested! He thinks women should be in charge, can't argue with that, but he is spot on, and a joy to listen to.....well unless you are a lefty.

The US is going to be in trouble if they re-elect Obama. Push back is coming from the Catholic Church and other Christian faiths. Obama made a huge mistake by supporting Planned Parenthood instead of Christians. It is building, in every Church in America, every sermon, every Sunday, from now until the election, will be about the effort by the Obama administration to take away the freedom of religion. They can try to disguise the issue with phoney women, testifying in phoney hearings, about phoney issues, but voters are not dumb.

Fluke Is Obama's New Poster "Child"

The lefties are all over a Conservatives comment about a privileged 30 year old woman who spends over a $1000 a year on contraceptives and wants US taxpayers to pay for her "choice". Rush called her a "slut". Ouch, harsh but true. A BIG deal is being made of his comment, ads are being withdrawn, two radio stations (out of hundreds) have stopped airing his show......even Obama called the poor thing for no other reason that it would help him with the female vote. Do they really think women are that stupid? Seriously?

One of my favorite reads the blog quebecois has all the dirt!

Maher has called Palin a “dumb twat” and dropped the C-word in describing the former Alaska governor. He called Palin and Congresswoman Bachmann “boobs” and “two bimbos.” He said of the former vice-presidential candidate, “She is not a mean girl. She is a crazy girl with mean ideas.” He recently made a joke about Rick Santorum’s wife using a vibrator. Imagine now the same joke during the 2008 primary with Michelle Obama’s name in it, and tell me that he would still have a job.

Not all lefties are calling for Rush's head. Powers speaks the truth about how lefties like Maher get away with calling Sarah Palin a c**t, and that's okay with the lefty media.


Just in case the video doesn't play, here is the link. 

Another good insight here:

But what I really don't get is this. If someone is spending $3,000 per year and they want to get insurance to cover it, how can they expect the insurance to cost less than $3,000? And why should they expect someone else to chip in? Do they think insurance is some form of magic where expenditures can be made without expenses being incurred? Or is this just a form of "I want to be behave irresponsibly and have someone else pick up the tab"? Or, "I want my freedom and someone else a slave to the costs involved"?

Who is Fluke? Who cares? She made a name for herself because of her lack of morals. She specifically targeted a Christian University, she is not an innocent obviously... HA! The Catholic Church has a lot of power, not politically, but spiritually and the war has just begun. It was on simmer, but it is now coming up to the boiling point. America is a Christian nation, and they are waking up and realizing that their President is not a moral or just man and his call to Fluke proves it. He is an opportunist. 

Should Rush have apologized?  Sure, when Maher apologizes to Sarah Palin. Double HA!

Dear Pope, Butt Out!

As a Catholic, I pay close attention to what the Church is preaching, but that does not mean that I blindly agree with everything they tell us to do or think. This is one of the times that I have to disagree with the Pope.

In Charity in Truth, which should be released next week, he is expected to point out the failings of capitalism and lament the world's roiling markets, exploited workers and the harsh disparity between rich and the poor.

"Many conservatives will be shocked and disappointed by the encyclical, which will reflect Benedict's skepticism toward unbridled capitalism based on greed," wrote Father Thomas Reese, an American Jesuit scholar and an expert on the Vatican.

"Unlike President Obama, who wants to reform a system that he believes is out of control, Pope Benedict wants to rethink the whole system."

Rethink the system into a communist state? Leave politicians like Obama out of this, or you will wear his defeat. Obama supports partial birth abortions.

Unbridled capitalism based on greed? Does the Church not preach 10% of your wages go to the tax exempt Church? Have you seen how the Pope lives? This Pope is a total disaster, he is doing more to drive people away from the faith than to unite them. "Harsh disparity between rich and the poor"? I might have accepted that from Mother Teresa because she lived what she preached, but from a Pope who lives in luxury, not a chance.

"We're in a desperate world," Fr. Rausch said. "To have some kind of clear teaching on how economic decisions impact on people is probably a good counterbalance to the typical American emphasis on 'Let the market be free. The market will solve its own problems.' "

The Church should stay out of the market, that is none of their business, except for how their billions donated by Catholics are invested. Let the Catholics be free than. Free to give nothing to the Church, because the Church invests that money in the "free markets" they are about to condemn!

It's time for the Pope to get back to the roots of what it means to be a Catholic. I have always been proud to be a Catholic, mainly because in a world with disintegrating morals, the Church has stood firm on issues like abortion. They have given clear guidance that we could follow. Even when I questioned some of the Churches stances, at least I knew what they stood for, and I could make my own decisions based on their teachings. It is not so clear anymore what they stand for, and that is disappointing in a world that needs a clear moral compass.

"Part of the role of the pope is to be able guide the Catholic Church and help it to read the signs of the times."

Said Prof. Gillis: "He is addressing the entire world, including non-Catholics. He is being a voice for the voiceless."

He is NOT being a voice for the voiceless, he is taking a stance from his own personal viewpoint. If he could really read the signs of the times he would understand that we are looking for clear moral direction, not a discussion on capitalism.

We lived through multiple Priests who lost their own moral compasses, and we gave the Church a chance to redeem itself by setting an example. I have yet to see that happen. Greed in the form of capitalism is not at fault for the existence of poor people. The Church is at fault for the decline in attendance at Mass because the people are losing faith.

Maybe the Church should concentrate on their lambs and forget about the lions.