Tuesday, August 31, 2010

A Slap In The Face!

I really feel that the mosque in New York at ground zero is a slap in the face to all westerners. It is a sad statement about terrorism. The victims are forgotten in the politically correct atmosphere that doesn't allow anyone to criticize Islam without being called a bigot.

I remember the morning of September 11, I hope we all do. Unfortunately, many people seem to prefer to forget that over 3000 totally innocent people lost their lives that day, including many firefighters who were trying to save all those people. I remember the story of the blind person with his seeing eye dog who guided him out to the building. Good puppy!! There were many stories of hero's that day. Without terrorism, we wouldn't need so many heroes!



With the arrests in Canada of terror suspects, it makes me think back to that horrible day, Sept 11.
Does building a mosque fundamentally change a nation? Not usually, but it might this time, as it is a slap in the face to all westerners and especially the over 3000 innocents killed on 9/11.

h/t Libby66

8 comments:

Pissedoff said...

Obviously it is not a slap in the face to that appeasing bastard Bloomberg or the Muzzie alledged prez Odumbo

liberal supporter said...

What would be an acceptable distance from Ground Zero for the construction of the "victory mosque"? 10 miles? 100 miles? 1000 miles?

What's the acceptable distance?

Does this "slap in the face" include one to the 59 or more muslims killed on 9/11? (no the terrorists are not included in this total).

maryT said...

Why isn't the fact that Bloomberg's company is in cahoots with Saudi Arabia to set up a branch of his financial empire. No wonder he support the GZ mosque. Probable will have money in it.

hunter said...

ls, it's not the distance, it's the intention. We all know it's about thumbing their noses at the west. It just seems only conservatives will mention the truth, lefties hide behind political correctness.

Unfortunately, Muslims kill Muslims daily, it's all about their lack of respect for human beings and life. They don't even respect their own lives.

Eskimo said...

They want to name the mosque 'Cordoba House'. Check your history LS and find out what the word 'Cordoba' is all about and what it signifies.

are you back now?

OK, good.

They can build Cordoba house in NYC just as soon as the Saudi government allows the construction of a building named the 'Crusades Christian Church' two blocks away from the Al-Masjid al-Ḥarām in Mecca. Or better yet, a Jewish Temple.

Now go play with your toys. Are you playing the moral equivelency card by stating that 59 Muslims died during 9/11 or are you just an idiot? Have you not learned in the years that passed since 9/11 that to a radical Muslim, if a fellow Muslim is killed in the process of a terror attack, to them it's just collateral damage and their murdered bretheren are just a means to an end?

Don't bother answering because I know already that you are an idiot. To radical Muslims and thier apologists, you'd be a 'useful' idiot.

liberal supporter said...

ls, it's not the distance, it's the intention. We all know it's about thumbing their noses at the west. It just seems only conservatives will mention the truth, lefties hide behind political correctness.
Baloney. So you would ban all Muslims in the US from building any kind of house of worship? What is the acceptable distance?

Unfortunately, Muslims kill Muslims daily, it's all about their lack of respect for human beings and life. They don't even respect their own lives.
I was unaware that only Muslims kill their own. Your point? What is the acceptable distance?

liberal supporter said...

They want to name the mosque 'Cordoba House'. Check your history LS and find out what the word 'Cordoba' is all about and what it signifies.
For Jews, it signifies learning and peace. "In the tenth century it became the seat of Jewish learning, scholarship and culture, gradually eclipsing the Babylonian academies of Sura and Pumbeditha." Source. Or perhaps are you thinking of the Inquisition of Cordoba (after the Moors were driven out) which was "especially cruel". You turn a blind eye to torture, perhaps this is what you see in Cordoba. But I don't.
Instead, I think it is about the various faiths living in peace and understanding each other as was true in Cordoba at various times.

are you back now?

OK, good
.
Pffft. I wasn't away.

They can build Cordoba house in NYC just as soon as the Saudi government allows the construction of a building named the 'Crusades Christian Church' two blocks away from the Al-Masjid al-Ḥarām in Mecca. Or better yet, a Jewish Temple.
So it all depends on what the Saudi government, a theocratic absolute monarchy, would allow. What other Saudi government edicts do you wish to live by? No women drivers? Public beheadings every week after prayers?

Do you want North America to become a theocratic absolute monarchy as well?


Now go play with your toys.
Spoken like a supporter of the Ruthless Party.

Are you playing the moral equivelency card by stating that 59 Muslims died during 9/11 or are you just an idiot?
Hmmm, that's a tough one. Can I say "no, I am not still beating my wife"? Hunter claims the Cordoba House is a "slap in the face" to the victims of 9-11. I asked Hunter how this building is a slap in the face to Muslims who died on 9-11. You chose to go ad hominem. Therefore, I thank you for effectively conceding the point.

Have you not learned in the years that passed since 9/11 that to a radical Muslim, if a fellow Muslim is killed in the process of a terror attack, to them it's just collateral damage and their murdered bretheren are just a means to an end?
All extremists think that way. Though they usually find a way to claim those killed were not "true" Muslims in some way. I'm sure Timothy McVeigh was able to rationalize away all the Christians he murdered, too.

What's your point? First you want to follow the same rules as a theocratic absolute monarchy, now you want to change your actions because of how it might make homicidal extremist terrorists feel and act. Why would you want to appease terrorists?

Don't bother answering because I know already that you are an idiot. To radical Muslims and thier apologists, you'd be a 'useful' idiot.

And in closing, you admit you have no argument. By going ad hominem yet again, you concede.

Thank you for conceding.

Eskimo said...

I love it when limp-wristed lefties like LS claim they've won the argument, crying ad hominem because of thier tender feelings.
It's funny to see the depths said lefties will sink just to not be on the side of someone of the conservative pursuassion.

From Wiki: "....Dhimmitude is a neologism first found in French denoting an attitude of concession, surrender and appeasement towards Islamic demands".