Sunday, December 31, 2006

My New Year's Resolution....

get more active to help stop abortions.

Suzanne has posted a very nice video on YouTube, no dismembered baby parts.

Why do we as a society allow this to happen? I have heard all the lefties arguements on this issue. So, let's look at the two main arguements:

1. It's a women's choice, take that away and we will be back to the back street abortions of old, with women dying.

Okay let's look at those bad old days. Society frowned on young unmarried girls who got pregnant, yet most opted to have their babies and were better for it. Society now finds nothing wrong with unwed Mothers, it was the unwed Mothers who changed societies opinion, not the women who killed their babies by having an abortion. You see, noone knew that those girls had killed their babies, but they did see the unwed Mothers with their children. It is the courageous unwed Mothers that we should be applauding, not the women who killed their babies because they were afraid of what society might say about them. Feminists can't see that, they think they are the ones that changed things, they did not.

Today, we have something that the women back then didn't have, it's called birth control. Why do 100,000 babies still need to be killed in Canada in this day and age? Stop funding abortions, watch the numbers decrease.

2. A women who is raped should be able to have an abortion.

Okay, let's look at that oft used feminist point. How many women are raped in Canada in a year? Looking at some StatsCan numbers, sexual assaults are 70 in 100,000. Of those how many would actually get pregnant?? That's the number noone mentions. So, let's say 700 women who get raped, also get pregnant, that sure doesn't add up to the 100,000 babies killed in Canada.

Let's just face the facts, people who believe abortions are okay, are immoral, and they want the rest of us to be dragged down to their level. It's funny how when a feminist wants to be pregnant, they call it a baby, when they don't it's a blob or fetus. Also, forget about the rights of the father, they do not exist.

We need to stop funding abortions. Why should I as a taxpayer be forced to pay for the killing of babies?

It's funny, the lefties are yelling about the hanging of a butcher like Saddam, saying he didn't have a fair trial, but it's okay by them to murder innocent babies.

Saturday, December 30, 2006

The Best!

It's been the best year, because the Conservatives are in government and doing a great job.

We have a Prime Minister who is going to go down as the very best PM in our history. The opposition can not even come close to our PM, even my Liberal Mom thinks Dion stinks.

We have a man of principle, morals and he's tough enough to do what needs to be done, not for votes, but because it's the right thing to do, for Canada.

All the Conservative MP's are doing a great job, but they would be doing even better with a majority.

Let me be the first to predict a majority for the Conservatives next election. That's not just my New Year Eve's wish, it's the smell in the air, it's true Canadians feeling proud of our government, it's Canadians who voted for change, liking that change. It's a government who is listening to real Canadians about their very real concerns.

Go Prime Minister Stephen Harper, you have my support, your doing a great job and people are sitting up and taking notice. Even my Liberal Mom!

Thursday, December 28, 2006

What A Year It Has Been!!

We are climbing out of the dark into the Conservative light, and even some Liberals are liking it!!

Well except maybe Robert Fife at CTV. I thought PM Harper did a great job of being positive without making the opposition look like the cry babies they really are, so, good interview, very strong message by Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Now, I know that CBC did an interview with our PM, but, can't find it anywhere on their website. Has it not aired yet? I was busy with Christmas, so I either missed it, or it is yet to come, not sure which, but in any event, CBC's website sucks big time.

How do I know that some Liberals are liking what the Conservatives are doing? Well, it's a small sample, but my VERY Liberal parents are going to vote Conservative next election, why, they thought that Catholic Cretien and Martin would stop SSM and put something in place to stop abortion, that's why they voted for them, only to be very disappointed. They love income splitting, and they like the fact that Day has booted some questionable characters out of the country. Most importantly, they do not like the idea of billions of Canadian dollars leaving Canada to help China with building factories, all in the name of the god called Kyoto. They might be in their 80's, but they realize how stupid that would be for their grandchildren.

So, 2 Liberals, will now vote Conservative, that's 2 more than we had last time, how many more are going our way?

All in all, Conservatives had a great year, and I am very proud of our Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his cabinet Ministers and MP's. Keep up the good work!!

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Rights Of The Child, UN Resolution

I was looking to blog on Human Rights Tribunals, and how out of control these semi-legal witch hunts are getting, and stumbled across this resolution from the UN.

Declaration of the Rights of the Child What struck me most was this part of the resolution:

Whereas the child, by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth,

Does that not mean a fetus? So, according to my limited understanding of this resolution, babies in the womb deserve to be protected, legally.

Further to that:

Principle 4
The child shall enjoy the benefits of social security. He shall be entitled to grow and develop in health; to this end, special care and protection shall be provided both to him and to his mother, including adequate pre-natal and post-natal care. The child shall have the right to adequate nutrition, housing, recreation and medical services.

Okay, correct me if I'm wrong, but pre-natal means, in the womb, he shall be entitled to grow and develop.

This is a UN resolution, it seems to me that it is protecting the rights of a baby, in the womb. So, why don't we hear about this? Nowhere does it state that women have the right to choose, nowhere does it say that partial birth abortions are a good thing and should be allowed. What it does say, is that children, in and out of the womb, should be "entitled to grow and develop". So, abortions deprive the child of the ability to grow and develop, therefore, they are not allowed under this resolution.

Much as I usually disagree with the UN, I agree with this resolution, wholeheartedly. Here come the lawyers, I'm sure, telling me that's not what the resolution really means....blah, blah, blah.

Legal protection before birth, that's very clear to me.

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Your Fired!

Well a step in the right direction.

"It's time for the wheat board to make a buck for Canadian farmers and to quit fiddling around in the political game," Strahl said.
The minister made his announcement at a staged rally west of Winnipeg. Farmers who oppose the wheat board's current monopoly on international wheat and barley sales surrounded him.

I liked the STAGED comment. Duhhh, maybe it was just farmer's who actually agree with the decision coming out to show their SUPPORT?

"You either have single-desk selling or you have don't have a CWB and they have presented no evidence that would counter that contention," said Mark Wartman, Saskatchewan's agriculture minister, in the vote's wake.
"Clearly, the majority of farmers are not buying that nonsense about dual-marketing."

Is Saskatchewan's agriculture minister really that much of a communist that he truly believes a monopoly, is a good thing? If the CWB is such a good thing, make it mandatory for eastern farmers to sell only to the CWB too. So, it's okay to throw western Canadian farmers into jail but eastern Canadian farmers can sell to who ever they want? One farmer went to jail for GIVING some of HIS grain to a 4H club in Montana.

"This issue is probably bigger than the Canadian Wheat Board, when you step back and look at it. And if you aren't free to speak out, what kind of country do we have?" Measner told CTV Winnipeg.

Hello, do you not even see the hypocrisy? Force farmers to jail for not selling to the CWB, but, when you get fired, it's a freedom of speech issue???? Come on, no wonder you were fired.

What about farmer's freedom to sell the wheat they produce on their own farms, to whoever they want to sell it to?

Communism, right here in Canada, I'm not making it up, I'm not allowed to!!!

Monday, December 18, 2006

Christmas Spirit Or Just Genuine Caring?

My boys made me proud today, they showed me they understand what the Christmas spirit is really all about, for all people.

I picked my boys up from school today and we headed to Tim Horton's so they could buy their teachers Christmas presents. I had preset the gift limit at $15 each. They were more interested in getting a donut as an after school snack as they were "starved". I have found that growing boys think with their stomachs, bless them, and thank God for my garden in the summer.

As I got out of the car at Tim Horton's, an old man standing near the door said something I couldn't hear, so I got closer and he was asking me for money for food. I dug around in my purse for awhile, but didn't have enough to give him, so I told him I would be back. He said sure as it was a nice day today.

When we got into Tim's my boys asked my what the old guy had wanted. I explained that he had asked me for money for food. I guess their "starved" stomachs told them that they really weren't so hungry, because they picked the cheapest gift each (sorry teachers) and then said they would prefer for the rest of the money to go to the old guy outside.

This was the first time they had ever been that close to a homeless person, and their compassion was instant. Christmas spirit, or just genuine caring? I'm hoping it's genuine caring, year round, and for life.

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Six Million Dead, Or Not!

I can not believe in this day and age that people are still denying the Holocaust ever happened. Worse is that the media is making it seem like it's no big thing.

In those days, the daily news was filled with the Rwandan genocide and ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia. On the day that my half-sister visited me, my head was reeling from what happened to 6 million Jews in Germany, Holland, France and Eastern Europe. I learned that innocent men, women and children were separated from each other. Stars pinned to their shoulders, transported by train to camps, they were gassed for no other reason than for being Jewish.

I saw pictures of masses of skeletons, even of kids. I heard horrifying accounts of some of the people who had survived the terror of Auschwitz and Sobibor. I told my half-sister all this and showed her the pictures in my history book. What she said was as awful as the information in my book. With great conviction, my half-sister cried: "It's a lie! Jews have a way of blinding people. They were not killed, gassed or massacred. But I pray to Allah that one day all the Jews in the world will be destroyed."

I pray to God that one day all religions will work towards peace.

Friday, December 15, 2006

Spring Election? Bring It On!!

Okay, newly elected Liberal leader Dion, is joining with the Bloq to bring down the Conservative government. Go ahead boys, bring it on!! Hey, didn't the Conservatives get accused of being in bed with the separatists anytime they voted the same way? Now it's okay because it's the Liberals joining with the separatists. Hypocrites.

So, wishy-washy boy wants an election, on what issue?

Environment, oh that's going to be fun, Dion was the minister of hot air that allowed our CO2 emissions to grow to over 35% above the Kyoto targets. He wants to bring NEP II to Alberta, oh well he can't lose there, we don't allow Liberals in redneck Alberta. Come see us Dion, we will clue you in pretty quick. The only good thing he did for the environment was to name his beautiful dog, Kyoto.

Afghanistan, wasn't it the Liberals that put us there, and shifted our troops into the dangerous province of Kandahar? Now, Dion wants us to turn tail and run? I think Dion should go visit Afghanistan and sleep out in the desert like PM Harper did, see what you think then, oh wait, he's French, do I see a white flag waving?

Social issues, right Dion, you were in Cabinet for 10 years, but no daycare spaces were created, the GST did not get reduced to zero, poverty did not get wiped out. Hey what did you Liberals do for 13 years, oh I remember now, little brown bags filled with cash going directly to the Liberal Party of Canada. Hey Dion, where's the 40 million still missing, we are still waiting for the cheque.

The new Liberals, with an old party Cretin puppet, yup they are renewed. NOT.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Who Are Your Senators And Why Are They Mostly Liberals?

Okay, all this elected senate debate made me think back to a provincial election where we had senate candidates on the ballot. I remember thinking, finally provinces will get some control over who we send to the senate. Sadly that was not to be. Martin did not appoint any of Alberta's senators in waiting. He thumbed his nose at us, and our senator elects.

So, I figure if senate reform is going to be an election issue, I should know who my senators are and who elected them.

Check out your province, see who your senators are, and what party they support, also take a look at who appointed them.

So, for Alberta, of 6 senators, 5 are Liberals, how did that happen in Alberta? Well, they were all appointed by Liberal PM's. Tommy Banks, a guy with a band, wow, I'm impressed with him as a politician, he will know all about policy in our government. As for the other 5, never heard of them, except Grant Mitchell, wasn't he a failed Alberta Liberal leader? Hey we didn't want him then, but now we are stuck with him in the senate? How he can hold his head up and say he is representing Alberta is unbelievable. We didn't want him as a Liberal leader, we sure don't want him as a senator. We are stuck with him, and all of the other liberal appointees.

Trudeau is dead, but we still have two senators in Alberta appointed by him (11 in total for the country). How is that fair, how is that democracy?

Bring on the vote for the senators to serve only 8 years, let all provinces do what Alberta did, choose their own senators. What a waste of taxpayers money the senate is. Get those senators away from the trough. If they don't like it, replace them.

We should start a petition to fire all the senators, and replace them with people we really wanted, not those former PM's appointed. We should have 5 senators per province and territory, to pass bills, and support what the provinces want. If they don't like that, then heck, let's just abolish this useless excuse of fake democracy.

Accountability at the least should mean that my Albertan senators should have a town hall every three months, so I can grill them on why they are not doing anything for Alberta, just for the Liberal party. Senators are supposed to represent their provinces, not their parties.

Hey, Mitchell, you sucked at being a liberal party leader, you suck even worse as a senator. I would love to say, YOUR FIRED!!! And take the rest of the no good liberal senators from Alberta, we haven't elected a Liberal party here in over 50 years, but we are stuck with you and 5 other hypocrites. OINK, OINK!!!

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

A Charter Right, For Babies!

Okay, if it is now a Charter right to protect the minority rights of gays to marry, I have an even more important Charter right, for an even more helpless minority, that is being killed in the thousands right here in Canada, by the majority.


Oh, you can call them fetuses all you like, try to make it sound like something other than killing babies, but, plain and simple, it's baby killing. Right here in our country, I'm not making it up, I'm not allowed to.

Choice or rights? Women's choice, or a babies rights?

A woman decides to have unprotected sex with a male, she gets pregnant, which happens to be inconvenient. It is now her choice to kill that baby. In Canada, she can have that baby killed even at nine months.

Now, funny they call gay marriage a right, but they call abortion a choice. Why aren't women calling for abortion to be a right? Well, they would turn off a lot of supporters if they went around saying, it is my right to kill my baby.

So, the feminists are using language that is acceptable to people. It's a women's body, it's her choice, they don't even call it abortion anymore. And, they have the male population so cowered, that they don't DARE disagree, because after all, it's their body. Only another woman can call them on it, and when they do, they are called bible thumping, dumb, uneducated females, who are substandard beings because they actually want to have babies. That whole "barefoot and in the kitchen" thingy. As if!

Well, this highly educated female is sick and tired of feminist SOW's. They claim that they have the right to kill their babies just because they happened to have unprotected sex, and unfortunately babies need to grow in their bodies, and they don't want them. So, off with their heads, arms, and legs. Suck their brains out? Sure. It's not killing, it's not a baby.

What a sick society we live in when gays can get married, and babies can get killed, and we the people, can do nothing about it. It's interesting, AIDS and abortion, both about death, both about reducing the ones who want their point of view to rule, yet they are killing themselves off.

There really is a God, and he is crying.

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Out West, It's Dion Who??

Maybe it's because liberals are not a threat out here, or maybe it's just that Albertans are too busy working to pay attention, but all I heard this week was, "Dion who?"

So far, those of us in the west who are paying attention, are not impressed. From his lack of English, to his dual citizenship, to his call for Kyoto and "sustainable development" aimed at the oil sands, to his support of the Canadian Wheat Board, it seems that Dion has written Alberta off as a no win province, so it's okay to bash it. Guess he thinks that will get him votes in Ont. and Que. , and it probably will, to some extent.

My question is, if he is such a federalist, why is he thumbing his nose at the province that is sending more money to Ottawa than any other province? Is he trying to make us so ticked off that we will separate? How does that make him a federalist.

I think it's time Albertans thumbed their noses at these liberal elitists. They think we are rednecked, knuckle dragging troglodytes, who drag women around by their hair. They also forget that we are the ones who are supporting the rest of Canada. We might only have 28 MP's, but we have all the big business coming here, we have no debt, and we have annual surplusses bigger than the federal government has for all of Canada, and Dion wants to tick us off? Is he on drugs?

Saturday, December 09, 2006

Christmas Tree For Our Troops!

What a wonderful show of support for our troops!

Excellent idea! Bet it makes the troops feel uplifted, but homesick.

Click on the video: Harper attends tree lighting. Way down the page. Shouldn't that be PM Harper attends tree lighting?

Prime Minister Harper and his daughter, Rachel attended this very special tree lighting.

Again our Prime Minister shows his support for the troops, and military families. What a class act this Prime Minister is, what a family man. He mentions Christmas about 6 times, no whimpy, politically correct, happy holidays for this PM. Good for him, good for Canada.

Meanwhile, what are the Liberals up to? Calling Conservatives, Nazis, and keeping their allegiance to the French flag flying. How lacking in class.

Thursday, December 07, 2006

Honour The Family.

So, marriage is between two people of any sex. Okay, fine our MP's voted on it again, and again they didn't listen to us, you know, the voter. Why no vote on this next election?

So, now that the 70% or more of people who honour families have been reduced to having marriage mean partner one, marries partner two, kids optional, or should I say mission impossible, I want to take back the family.

I want a law that says that a family is one man, one woman who are capable of having children naturally. All right, that's not going to happen now either is it? How about gays not being able to adopt? Okay, no, that's discrimination now.

So, how did the majority get hi-jacked by the minority?

-Politicians who can't even say Merry Christmas anymore for fear of loosing a vote.
-A loud vocal, usually naked, parading gay community, who want to appear normal, but no matter what, the majority is not buying it.
-And this whole BS about political correctness gone wrong.

So, what can the average middle class working family do about it? Usually we are too busy to really care about the gay community, that's how they managed to take over marriage. Why wasn't "union" enough for gays? Because they want us to believe they are normal. Okay let them distort marriage, do you notice how it's called SSM? It's still not Church sanctioned marriage, but that's next.

Churches need to fight back, with two words, Holy Matrimony. Holy Matrimony is both Church sanctioned and government sanctioned, it is legal. Churches should now make the distinction between marriage and Holy Matrimony. Marriage can stay at two partners of any sex.

Holy Matrimony should be exclusively, one man and one woman.

So, if the united church wants to marry gays, okay. If other churches want to unite a couple, one man and one woman, in Holy Matrimony, okay. Both couples are legally "married", neither couple is less in the eyes of the law.

Problem solved.

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

Women Have Choice, Farmer's Not So Much!

Well, we hear the lefties yelling about abortion being a women's choice. It's her body, we hear.

Now, how come it's a choice for women and it's their body, their right, but not for our farmer's?

It's their land, their grain, why isn't it their right to sell it to whoever they want?

So, you think the lefties would be shouting about the injustice of farmer's being thrown in jail for trying to sell their own grain. Not so much.

The New leader of the old party, wants to protect the Canadian Wheat Board monopoly.

Liberal leader St├ęphane Dion promised Wednesday to fight to protect the Canadian Wheat Board should the Tory government succeed in dismantling it.

Oh great, so far, Dion has threatened our oil sands projects, and now he's threatening to not allow farmer's any choice.

Why is it called the Canadian Wheat Board when it's only western farmers that are FORCED to sell their wheat to the board? Maybe they should rename it the Western Wheat Monopoly Board.

Now, why would the Liberals be so intent on keeping the monopoly? Anyone who has taken an introductory economics course knows that monopolies are bad for consumers. Why does the Liberal Senate NOT want the CWB books opened up to the public? Why did the Liberal party keep appointing (OINK) 5 out of 15 board members? Why are they scared that some farmers might sell their wheat on their own?

If we told women that they had no choice, the screaming would be deafening. That's what the Liberals are telling our farmers. Does anyone wonder why the Liberals suck in rural areas?

I think all farmers need to band together, and start yelling:

Our Grain, Our Choice.

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

This Isn't Going To Loosen My Wallet.

I understand that some First Nations People are truly having problems. The Indian Act is clearly NOT working. It never works when you give different rights and privileges to any group.

Protest if you want to get your issue heard, but when a Minister has the courage to come out and try to talk to you, booing them, is just disrespectful. You should be ashamed of yourselves. From what I understand of your culture, respect is very important. If you give none, you will get none.

It sure doesn't make me think I should loosen my wallet anymore than I already have to help. Show some respect to the people who pay billions to your nations, we might listen harder, and you might gain some respect from us for your cause. By booing our elected representatives, you are booing all Canadians.

Show NO respect for the Minister that is trying to help you, than you will get no respect, and our hearts will be hardened to your cause. Listen to your elders, you will not be led astray. Listen to a politically motivated leader that lives better than any of you can hope to, your cause is lost.

My grandfather used to say that you could achieve more by getting the community together to build the barn, that still holds true today. Booing just divides the community.

What would your ancestors think about your behaviour lately?

Monday, December 04, 2006

The New Feminist, Not What The Old Feminists Want

I often come into contact with young ladies, and I have started to notice a trend when talking to them.

They are strongly pro-life, or as I prefer, for life.

I talked to three young ladies today who were deeply disturbed to learn that Canada had no abortion law. They thought that there was a cut off for when abortions were legally permitted.

They were also very upset that taxpayers were paying for the killing of babies. They all agreed that any woman could use birth control, and were careless if they didn't. They also all agreed that it would be no big deal if they got pregnant without being married, they would be supported by their families and would have the baby rather than abort it.

None of them called the baby a fetus, none of them mentioned "choice". None of them were fooled by the feminist language, they all knew abortion was killing a baby. Why can't our judges understand that, why do they insist on thinking that women are so stupid that they do not realize they are killing a baby? Why do feminists think they are fooling anyone.

Why aren't the SOW's standing up against the killing of babies? Nope, they want equal pay, how trivial.

Old feminists, meet the new feminists, women who care about babies, who are educated, and SHOCK, want to actually have babies and a career. Some of them, even though they have a career, want to be stay at home Mom's.

Watch out, the new feminists are waking up to the fact that Canada has no abortion law, and they are not liking it, not one little bit.

Sunday, December 03, 2006

Liberal Leader For One Day, And He Ticks Off Alberta!

WOW, it sure didn't take Dion long to tick off all of Alberta, less than a day.

I don't see him saying anything about the auto industry? He could have ticked Ontario off too!! Oh, forgive me, voters count there.

Guess he figures he can't get any votes here in Alberta, so he might as well just go ahead and start talking about NEP II right away, that way when the Liberals get back into power, Albertan's will already be conditioned to just bend over.

Next, he will start talking about Carbon Credits, the Liberal plan to steal from our kids futures, to help Communist China.

Green groups also say the massive amounts of superheated steam used in the process of separating oil from the tar are putting local water supplies are at risk.
"We have a very good plan for Alberta, precisely because there are so many things to do in Alberta. We have a golden opportunity," said Dion, giving few specific details.
"If we succeed in Fort McMurray, perhaps sustainable development will succeed everywhere in the world and we will export our know-how and we'll make megatons of money," the French-speaking politician said in English.
"Certainly it will mean to revisit the system, but not to put the money out of Alberta, (but) to help to save their water, to save their development," he said.

Let me tell you this, you can take your plan for Alberta, and shove it where the sun don't shine! You want "sustainable development"? Go to Africa, they need lots of development there, if not Africa, try the Yukon, your dog Kyoto will love living there. Maybe going there will help you figure out, why Canada uses so much energy in the winter!

Friday, December 01, 2006

Why Do Only Lefties Protest?

It amazes me that lefties have so much time on their hands that they can protest at the drop of a hat.

Mexico, lefties protesting that they didn't win!
Lebanon, lefties protesting that they don't like their government.
Canada, lefties produce a pink book, protesting against women.

Muslims, well, they just protest anything, anytime, anywhere, YAWN.

SOW's, they bring daycare kids to protest on Parliament Hill, shouldn't those kids be in a safe, caring, loving, environment? That sure isn't Parliament Hill last time I watched Question Period!!

When is the last time you can think of when righties protested? Anything? I have been trying to think of the last time, maybe they do protest, we just don't see it on the MSM, as it's not news when righties protest something.

Now, I do remember the Red Friday rally on Parliament Hill, but that wasn't a protest, it was a celebration of our troops.

Maybe if lefties got real jobs, you know, ones that really helped women, or the disabled, they wouldn't have time to protest.

Get a real job!!