So, marriage is between two people of any sex. Okay, fine our MP's voted on it again, and again they didn't listen to us, you know, the voter. Why no vote on this next election?
So, now that the 70% or more of people who honour families have been reduced to having marriage mean partner one, marries partner two, kids optional, or should I say mission impossible, I want to take back the family.
I want a law that says that a family is one man, one woman who are capable of having children naturally. All right, that's not going to happen now either is it? How about gays not being able to adopt? Okay, no, that's discrimination now.
So, how did the majority get hi-jacked by the minority?
-Politicians who can't even say Merry Christmas anymore for fear of loosing a vote.
-A loud vocal, usually naked, parading gay community, who want to appear normal, but no matter what, the majority is not buying it.
-And this whole BS about political correctness gone wrong.
So, what can the average middle class working family do about it? Usually we are too busy to really care about the gay community, that's how they managed to take over marriage. Why wasn't "union" enough for gays? Because they want us to believe they are normal. Okay let them distort marriage, do you notice how it's called SSM? It's still not Church sanctioned marriage, but that's next.
Churches need to fight back, with two words, Holy Matrimony. Holy Matrimony is both Church sanctioned and government sanctioned, it is legal. Churches should now make the distinction between marriage and Holy Matrimony. Marriage can stay at two partners of any sex.
Holy Matrimony should be exclusively, one man and one woman.
So, if the united church wants to marry gays, okay. If other churches want to unite a couple, one man and one woman, in Holy Matrimony, okay. Both couples are legally "married", neither couple is less in the eyes of the law.
Problem solved.
No comments:
Post a Comment