Coming To America!

Interesting information about Obama's aunt, found at Small Dead Animals.

I received this cartoon a few weeks ago, but thought it wasn't really relevant, guess I was wrong.

Obama relatives coming for a visit at the White House. (Hey lefties, it's a joke!)

So, Obama didn't know his aunt was in America illegally? Poor Joe the Plumber gets his records checked illegally by Obama supporters, now his aunt is found to be in America illegally and has contributed to his campaign illegally, with only a whisper in the press.

Are Americans going quietly into socialism? Here is a good take on freedom of speech, and the 2nd Amendment:



Kind of says it all doesn't it.

As A Female...

As a female, I have been totally disgusted by some of the Blogging Tories attacking Sarah Palin. So, let me clue you in. Talking about $150,000 spent on clothes during a campaign is as petty as you can get, (those two pillars for Obama's speech, over $150,000, but let's not let facts get in the way of our agendas)it shows a real lack of seriousness about the real issues, like socialism.

As a female, I respect Sarah Palin, as a mother, a woman, a wife and the Governor of the state of Alaska. I can recognize a strong woman without feeling threatened, so can McCain, too bad the MSM is so insecure they have to try and slander her because she is so strong.

As a female, I would never have been able to support Hillary, any woman who would put up with her husband fooling around on her, is not tough enough to run a county let alone her own household.

As a female, Obama scares me, not inspires me. Dating is a scary thing for a female, so most of us rely on that 6th sense. My antenna started twitching the minute I heard Obama speak, he reminded me of a used car salesman, promising me the car was sound, while crossing his fingers behind his back, and grinning at me. Personally, he gives me the heebie geebies. All fluff and no substance, and just that little bit of "noway" thrown in.

As a female, McCain is the better choice. He wanted the surge, he knew that it would stop Americans from dying. He is a war hero, he has put his country first, you know he will not be swayed by terrorists.

As a female, I fear the direction the US would go if they elect Obama, socialism can not ever work. You can not be Robin Hood if you want your country to stay strong. No robber has ever made a positive impact on society. Obama Hood is not a good idea for America. If he wins, Canada will suffer because Democrats are protectionists.

As a female, I know a phony when I see one, and Obama is a phony. God bless Canada for re-electing a strong leader when the US is the weakest it has ever been.

As a female, I vote NO for Obama, YES for McCain and Sarah Palin.

O... Oprah!

It appears Oprah is going to pay for her support of Obama, better known as the big O, or as I have seen recently, the big zero.



The comments are very interesting.

If Oprah's intention was to prevent the show from being used as a platform showcase, I wonder what the reasoning is of having Obama as a guest of the show twice. Maybe if it was Hilary, or if Palin was a democrat, Oprah would make an exception for her like she did for Obama.

This is the problem Oprah faces, she has used her show to openly support Obama, she has become political. She has somehow forgotten that her money and position came from ALL people, not just Democrats. Women has been her biggest viewers, both Democrats and Republicans. She is showing she is not fair and balanced. She is not a movie star who can live off of the next movie, she is a talk show host who can be hurt badly by Republican women tuning her out.

It's apparently more important to her to break the race barrier than to break the "glass ceiling" that is always talked about.

Oprah is typical of the liberal female left....they are only open minded if you agree with them. Oprah cannot have Palin on.....an on air interview would give Sarah Palin a forum to be heard. All the left wants to do now is silence Palin. So much for free speech.

Oprah has a large group of women who watch her show, and she supports Obama. So in a way she's using her show to promote for him. Having Palin on the show, I think would scare her, as to losing a lot of women supporters of Obama.

Just a few examples from the comments. It's not looking good for Oprah. It's a shame because I respected her for how far she had come from the background she grew up in. Now, her fame has gone to her head. Entertainment celebrities should stay out of politics.

SCORE!

Sarah Palin knocked one out of the park tonight! What a class act! She introduced her family and did not rise to the media bait. She did not attempt to "justify" anything, she mentioned that her family has bumps, just like every other family. SCORE!

She cross checked Obama and his lack of experience. SCORE!

Here is your typical feminist response:

Lisa
I thought women came a long way now this woman sarah wants to put us back in the stone age. Please

This disgusts me to no end, because even women are trying to destroy Sarah.

Well, Lisa, if you are as "progressive" as you think you are, you should be supporting the Governor of Alaska, she's the real deal! If you can't see that, or refuse to see that, you are a follower not a leader, you are so insecure that you can't support a strong woman. In other words, you are a loser who will probably vote for Dion because he is so non-threatening. PM Harper probably makes you shake in your boots because he's a take charge kind of guy, and very threatening to your "welfare for life" dreams.

Get out of the 60's you feminists, the time when an unmarried pregnant teen was a disgrace are GONE! Funny how the "progressives" are attacking a 17 year old teen for CHOOSING to keep her baby. Killing that baby would have been better in their eyes.

Well, Sarah Palin just clued a lot of fake women in, and make no mistake, this is about to become the special interest feminists against Palin. What these deather's don't understand is that some women CHOOSE to keep their babies, no matter what the trials, because they respect life.

Sarah Palin just scored a big one, and boarded Obama into the glass. That glass ceiling just cracked wide open and real women understand that, big time!

Go McCain/Palin! SCORE!

My Husband Calls BS!

I'm the political one, but tonight my husband actually watched Obama speak. He calls BS. This is a guy who will tell a woman he has just met, that her perfume is too strong, or that her lipstick is the wrong colour. He is usually right. I think he is right this time. I won't tell you what he thought of Michelle Obama, this is a family site.

My view, the speech was typical Obama, lots of preachy platitudes, no substance. It was too long, and flat. A chicken in every pot, and look at me, the poor boy who suffered. Sorry not buying it. He reminds me of a cousin I have. My parents gave him a camera for his birthday, he said thanks, and forget to ever open up the card which contained a cheque that he never cashed, because he was too self involved to even bother to read the card. The camera was just a small token, the cheque was the big prize, and he totally missed the prize.

I hope McCain surprises some small town by appearing there and accepting his nomination. Obama is spending millions for his speeches in stadiums, yet he attacks McCain for having too many houses. Typical Liberal, they don't even see their own hypocrisy. Fireworks? Are you kidding me???

I agree with my hubby, BS. This guy is a used car salesman.

Straight Talk!

Dr Roy pointed me to this speech by David Cameron, it's worth reading.

What I want to know is, will Britain listen? Or are they lost? Because I know most of you will not click and read the whole article, here are some of the best parts:

"With over five million people in our country on out of work benefits, many of them on Incapacity Benefit, welfare dependency is now a crisis for the whole country, not just this corner of it.....

"A sixteen year-old boy stabbed in north London; a sixty year-old man sitting around in Easterhouse who's never had a job. A twenty-eight year-old woman stabbed in south London; a forty-eight year old woman dying from heart disease in Gallowgate.

"The thread that links it all together passes, yes, through family breakdown, welfare dependency, debt, drugs, poverty, poor policing, inadequate housing, and failing schools but it is a thread that goes deeper, as we see a society that is in danger of losing its sense of personal responsibility, social responsibility, common decency and, yes, even public morality....

"Imagine if there was a Government that understood, really understood, that encouraging personal and social responsibility must be the cornerstone of everything that it did and that every move it took re-inforced that view....

"Above all, I believe that this cultural change needs to start at home. The values we need to repair our broken society and to build a strong society are values that should be taught in the home, in the family.

"That is why I have put the family right at the heart of my programme. Action on knife crime. Better policing and criminal justice reform. Reforming schools. Reforming welfare. These are all vital components of the social reform we need so urgently.

"But in the end, the state cannot do it all. In the end, the best regulation is self-regulation, not state regulation. That's why the family comes first. That's where we can really turn things around and start to repair our broken society.

Clearly Cameron deserves to be elected. He is very direct about the problems facing Britain, it's time for change, not the limp wristed type of change Obama is talking about, real change, where families matter again. Maybe someone should send this speech to McCain and PM Harper, because common sense makes sense.

He's Coming To Canada.

Who are the "Canadian Press"? They sure aren't unbiased reporters of the news. Take this article for example.

McCain coming to Canada for free trade speech

The Canadian Press

OTTAWA -- Canada appears destined to be dragged into the centre of the U.S. presidential debate once again.

Republican presidential nominee John McCain has sought and received an invitation to Ottawa to give a speech next week on free trade.

The Vietnam war hero's presence in Canada's national capital and his choice of subject matter is bound to revive controversy over the so-called NAFTA-gate affair, which embarrassed his Democratic rival, Barack Obama, earlier this year.

Oh, poor Obama, he might be embassassed. Cry me a river of crocodile tears. Doesn't McCain have a daughter living in Canada? Wouldn't that be nice to mention?

Tattersall said the club has checked with three historians and, as far as they can tell, this will be the first time a U.S. presidential nominee has come to Canada mid-campaign.

Oh, so he's making a special trip to reassure Canadians that he will not mess with a trade agreement that provides 80% of us with jobs, and this is a no-no because noone else has ever done that before?

McCain's choice of topic and venue is unlikely to be coincidental. Even if the nominee himself makes no mention of NAFTA-gate, the planeload of American reporters travelling with him will undoubtedly make the link, prompting yet more grief for Obama.

His appearance may also provoke some additional awkwardness for Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

How many times can you mention NAFTA-gate in one article? Why should it provide any awkwardness for the PM? We have the big stick when it comes to free trade, it's called oil!

For Harper, any reminder of the sorry episode is bound to be awkward since it originated with his own chief of staff, Ian Brodie.

Brodie told some CTV reporters during the budget lockup that it was rival Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton whose team had signalled she had no intention of following through on her tough talk about renegotiating NAFTA. While Brodie apparently got the candidate wrong, his comments set reporters on the trail of the story, which eventually led to the leaked memo.....

....Harper, determined to prove his government was not intentionally interfering, ordered Canada's top public servant, Kevin Lynch, to conduct an inquiry into the leak.

Lynch cleared Brodie and Michael Wilson, Canada's ambassador to Washington, last month. He blamed Foreign Affairs bureaucrats for disseminating the memo too widely to maintain secrecy.

They finally at the end of the article get around to stating that NAFTA-gate, was the fault of foreign affairs. Funny how those Foreign Affairs bureaucrats keep popping up. Could they be stirring the pot, first with Brodie and then with a Minister of the Government? Are they a little too powerful? They remind me of the Human Rights Commissions, over stepping their bounds to keep the little kingdom they run safe from Canadians. Someone's head at foreign affairs needs to roll. Or maybe, we should FIRE THEM ALL.

It's Still Friday Night Here, So, I Present: McCain Sings

I have this wonderful American friend who sends me the funniest videos, here's another one of her video picks. McCain takes on Streisand.



I like McCain, he's normal compared to the Democrat candidates. Hillary, is a weak woman, she should have kicked Billy Boy to the curb but didn't, (Someone should talk to Belinda about him) how will she handle another attack on US soil?

Obama, is all bluster and no policy. He also failed to distance himself from his wacko Minister, how will he react to another attack on America?

McCain is not only a war hero, he knows what evil exists in our world, he has been a prisoner of war, he has been tortured (not sissy water boarding), yet, he still has a sense of humour as you can clearly see in this video.

So, while the Democrats are tearing themselves up trying to pick their candidate for President, the Republicans are done. Typical Liberals, lots of talk no action.

McCain Gets Mulroneyized!

The Times have dug back, way back, to the 1990's to try and dig up some dirt on McCain, kind of like the Liberals here dug up Schreiber from the 1990's to try and smear Mulroney, and hopefully PM Harper and the Conservative party. Maybe the Times should have asked our press how well that worked before they ran with a "undisclosed" sources article.

The New Republic claims it was about to break an article about the Times, and that is why the Times story came out now.

Beyond its revelations, however, what's most remarkable about the article is that it appeared in the paper at all: The new information it reveals focuses on the private matters of the candidate, and relies entirely on the anecdotal evidence of McCain's former staffers to justify the piece--both personal and anecdotal elements unusual in the Gray Lady. The story is filled with awkward journalistic moves--the piece contains a collection of decade-old stories about McCain and Iseman appearing at functions together and concerns voiced by McCain's aides that the Senator shouldn't be seen in public with Iseman--and departs from the Times' usual authoritative voice. At one point, the piece suggestively states: "In 1999 she began showing up so frequently in his offices and at campaign events that staff members took notice. One recalled asking, 'Why is she always around?'" In the absence of concrete, printable proof that McCain and Iseman were an item, the piece delicately steps around purported romance and instead reports on the debate within the McCain campaign about the alleged affair.

Now I'm not up on the US nomination races, but it appears to me that the Liberals are up to the same tricks in the US as they are here in Canada. I suspect if you are a Liberal, you love the Times report, even though it's unsupported by FACTS. Too bad the Times had to tip their hand early, I bet they were saving it to use after McCain won the Republican nomination. Funny, this just might unite the right in the US.

If you have to dig up 15 year old dirt on someone, your case is weak, and your political stance is showing. Just like the Liberals here in Canada trying to dig up dirt on Mulroney, it backfired here, I expect it to backfire in the US. Maybe the Times should write an article about how Hillary sticks by her man, through thick and thin, short and tall, young and old. Maybe they could do an article on Belinda and Bill Clinton! She was seen with him at numerous times, at numerous functions. NO? Wonder why not?

Liberals, always looking for smut, because it's what they do. You could smack a Liberal over the head with a moral, and they would have no idea what hit them.