Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Too Much Time On Their Hands!

I already miss the proroguing of Parliament. I haven't been able to watch QP this week, but I don't really need to because it's just back to the same garbage as before Christmas. It's time for MP's to take a look at their responsibilities. First and foremost, they need to listen to their constituents. We don't need 308 MP's going to Ottawa to argue about this bill or that. We have too many laws and bills now. Maybe OUR representatives could start cutting some of the red tape and rid Parliament of endless bills that just tie us down as citizens. Every bill that gets passed takes away a little bit more of our freedoms. Here is how stupid our society is getting:

Britain's latest nanny-law targets unruly dogs

Britain already leads the world in spying on its citizens with closed-circuit cameras. There are 4.2 million cameras in Britain, one for every 14 people, and twice as many as China uses to keep control if its 1.3 billion people, according to the Daily Mail.

You'd think that would satisfy the government's need to intrude on the lives of the average Brit, but not even close. The latest scheme is aimed at extending state control over dogs.

The Independent reports that plans are under consideration to force dog owners to buy insurance to cover themselves in case their pet attacks someone, and also to require that every dog be microchipped.


I know it's Britain, but it appears their legislators have way too much time on their hands. Make work so that MP's can justify their salaries?

How about let's adopt the Texas method:

The Texas Legislature meets in a regular session every two years, convening on the second Tuesday in January of every odd-numbered year. These biennial sessions are limited to 140 days. The governor can also call additional special sessions as necessary, which cannot exceed 30 days.


They meet every two years, do they get anything done?

81st Texas Legislative Session (2009)

The governor signed 1,656 bills and resolutions, vetoed 38 and allowed 12 to become law without his signature from the Regular Legislative Session that ended on June 1, 2009. Two additional bills were passed in a Special Session held July 1-2, 2009.


If 17 days of prorogue sent our opposition parties into a frenzy, can you imagine the Conservative government proposing they only meet every two years for 140 days? Yikes!!! It's not going to happen of course, because the opposition feed off of Question Period. They are addicted to getting their faces in front of the cameras. Case in point Jack Layton during the Canada-USA gold medal hockey game, front and center and making sure not even a female gets in his way. So rude and lacking class Jack.

Here is an idea to make Canada better. Go through all our laws, starting with the very first one, and if they no longer apply, get rid of them. Update them, and write them without all the legal terminology. Give the government back the right to MAKE the laws, and cut off the Supreme judges power to decide what the law REALLY means.

Start with the HRC's. I know the Conservatives are scared that not enough people support getting rid of the HRC's, but it's time, after 4 years in office, for the Conservative government to grow some resolve, and take some positions that might not be popular with the lefties (Hint: they are not EVER going to vote for you anyways). Federal Conservatives need to look to Alberta, the reason Wildrose is so popular is that the provincial conservatives are acting like liberals. It's time for the federal Conservatives to at least act like conservatives.

Our MP's have too much time on their hands, and have lost their way. All MP's need to get back to their ridings and listen to what the people are saying, not what their parties are telling them to say.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

ly off-topic but I have to say that I'm pretty disgusted by the Jaffer verdict and his blatant dismissing of his culpability in his non-apology to the media. He apologized for driving carelessly but totally ignored his drunkeness and his cocaine possession. Although he was a Tory and although I am 100% partisan, I have to say that I hope he leaves the party and never returns. Political leanings aside, he is, IMHO, a sorry excuse for a man. I'm not impressed with his wife's behaviour, either. I, for one, will be happy to see the two of them go. We don't need that kind of individual in our party. It's a sad day for our justice system when somebody gets off that easily. Pretty disgusting.

CanadianSense said...

I am in the minority who want Derek Lee to NOT back down, and the Liberals to stand up for something, anything!

If they truly believe it, than bring contempt forward regardless of an election risk.

It seems the chickenlittles don't trust the voters to agree with them.

The Seer said...

I think a good idea would be to have direct rule by the prime minister. The guys in the PMO are a lot smarter than all these ministers anyway, and the PMO doesn't do question period. And we would know who's responsible for everything so this would be real responsible government.

Southern Quebec said...

OMG!!!! I agree with E of E. I thought you guys were the tough on crime people? Not so much though when it's a Conservative committing the crime...

And his wife...she should have been arrested at the airport. Or at least Tasered. If she had been speaking Polish, she'd be dead.

wilson said...

CS, the current Liberal party does not believe in anything that won't get them back into power.

Donolo and Kinsella will decide if the move is good politically,
they were not hired to rebuild the party, just advance it in the polls.

And Iffy doesn't have a flaming clue what he is doing.

Anonymous said...

SQ - the federal government had nothing to do with Jaffer's arrest. Apparently, a young rookie screwed up the strip search - apparently, allegedly, supposedly. It has nothing to do with our PM or the Conservative party - the police in Liberal Ontario apparently screwed up. I would dislike Jaffer no matter what party - the guy has always struck me as an arrogant little slimeball.

Anonymous said...

S Trou de Queue: your silly crack about us being tough on crime just negated your own feeble attempt at making a jab. Yes, of course I'm a tough on crime person. That's why I think Jaffer is a slimeball and that the sentence he received is an outrage. However, if you read more than just the back of your matchbook, you'd know that these sorts of deals happen all the time - this was from an executive with MADD. So, it's not just Jaffer who got away with it. It enrages me that the Liberal governments ruined what was once a good judicial system and have put ordinary Canadians in grave danger from drunk or stoned drivers.