Saturday, February 07, 2009

Mulcair Has A Temper Tantrum!

The NDP are trying to prove just how useless they really are, and they are doing a fine job of it! The finance committee met for it's second time and Mulcair had a tantrum because he didn't get as many turns as he wanted. Funny, why is he even on the committee when the NDP voted against the budget?



He is one of my least favourite MP's in Parliament, and for him to act out like he did really confirms why I dislike him. The finance committee is the one committee that the government has control of, and for him to make allegations after only one meeting shows how disruptive the NDP are going to be on committees. They are the main reason that Parliament was so dysfunctional before and it looks like they are up to the same tricks again. After Layton got caught making backroom deals with the Bloc, you would think that they would smarten up.

Maybe we should start sending the NDP soothers, think they would get the hint?

14 comments:

Patsplace said...

May God have mercy on our souls if Commie Wanna-be's like the NDP ever get in power. I shudder to think of the horrible things they would do to Canadians....for the good of the State, don'cha'no!!

Babylonian777 said...

Apparently he was climbing on chairs in parliament when he was speaking out on behalf of a gay member of his community who was scheduled to be deported. If I recal, the footage showed him pointing his finger and yelling shame, he seemed to be crying as well, definatley short of words, it was only reported he was climbing on the chairs though.

Gayle said...

The main reason committees were so dysfunctional has to do with the party whose MP's had a handbook teaching them how to make committees dysfunctional.

West Coast Teddi said...

As I recall "the Handbook" was written to fend off the BS tactics of the Liberals / NDP and the Bloc. Looks like we hit the nail on the head and slammed the door shut on the opposition's stupidity.

What a load of crap

maryT said...

Climbing over chairs, did he take lessons from Sheila Copps and the RatPack of liberal opposition days.

Allan said...

May I ask, who wrote the headlines on the video clip, a fourteen year old? The level of discourse on these Con sites is junior high-school level. Really. I see now why the Harper cabinet has performed so poorly... Ambrose, O'Connor, etc. etc. etc. ... intellectually challenged.

KURSK said...

Ever been to Rabble, Allan?

Maybe that leftist discourse suits you just fine..

West Coast Teddi said...

Hey Hay Allan nallA

You have it backwards - the medium is the message.

hunter said...

Actually Allan, it was my 13 year old, see how smart us rednecks are, we brainwash our children early.

Now, given his childish actions, Mulcair could use some advice from you. Or do both of you need a soother? WAHHHHH!

Anonymous said...

Hunter, why don't you provide a link to an unedited version of the footage so people can decide for themselves who is behaving badly or not?

For example, in your "video", Mulcair calls whatever Wallace said, an attack - but your edit leaves said remarks out entirely.

Anonymous said...

West Coast Teddi - Gayle has been repeating this one for months - kind of a repeat of the same old speaking point over and over. It's old, old, old news but she mentions this and other speaking points at every opportunity.

Gayle - it's over, it's done, let's move on please. The CPC merely put on paper what the LPC and NDP have been practicing for years. Now, please stop inserting your pettiness where it does not serve any purpose. Your repeated speaking point has no relevance. Whether or not the CPC formalized the LPC and NDP way has no bearing on this MP's behaviour. This is nothing but your usual attempt to hurl an anti-Harper speaking point. Old and way out of date.

Anonymous said...

Allan - your comment is silly and very juvenile. The content is important, presentation is not. Now, if you commented on the content, it would be a different matter. As such, your comment is silly and it totally evades the real issue.

Anonymous said...

I couldn't watch the video for long. I really hate it when there is a shaky translation and I really, really hate this habit of translators being the opposite sex. Somehow, a female voice just does not go with the beard. I'd rather hear the person speak in his or her native language (I'm bilingual) with sub-titles. Do you know if an un-dubbed version is available?

As for Mulcair's behaviour - it has absolutely nothing - NOTHING - to do with this so-called booklet that Gayle tossed in their just to vent her personal hatred of Harper. Such a silly argument and so irrelevant. Mulcair was being immature and would have been with or without this so-called book. Really lame argument to bring up this so-called book.

prairie dog said...

Okay, I'll pony up for a few soothers, but I think once they realized how "soothing" the soother is, all the cry babies from the NDP will be screaming for one...sheesh!