Sunday, March 29, 2009

The Conspirators!


It starts small, with whispers, rumours and hushed talking. It is started by those who have a purpose and a goal that they know people will not like, and they slowly, create a worm of doubt, a hint of a problem, a smell of something not right in the air.

They are the conspirators.

They start small, then they get bolder, thinking that we must agree, because we have not protested (a decidedly lefty thing). They are sneaky and underhanded, pretending to be something that they are not, they are the weaklings hoping to rise to power.

They are the conspirators.

Who might they be? You might be thinking it's the lefties, but for once, they are not the problem, those within are the ones I am talking about. Remember it starts small, with a whisper...

One day, Prime Minister Stephen Harper will step down as leader of the Conservative party. And when that day comes, it will be a dark time for the Conservatives.

Let's face it; the Conservative party is not exactly one big happy family. Rather, it's a fragile grouping of two hostile political tribes which in the name of electoral convenience have managed to forge a successful yet uneasy alliance.


This is the way of the conspirators, create division hoping to gain from the very fact that you are the one creating that division. Attack the party that you supposedly support, while fracturing a fragile alliance with your weasel words. Give ammunition to your enemies as long as it elevates your position in your own eyes.

Three times in recent weeks, for no apparent reason, we have been pleasantly entertained by senior Conservatives who, one suspects, would otherwise wish us no ill that wasn't slow, painful and terminal.

This suggests that either spring delirium has come early to the nation's capital, or Stephen Harper's party of the bound and gagged is starting to break loose for reasons worth risking the boss's wrath.


Ammunition that allows reporters to pretend that they are only reporting what they have heard from "annoy-mouse" sources. These senior "conservatives" are being laughed at and used for the PLEASURE of the MSM. They allow the media to make real Conservatives look like fools, because it is coming from conservatives.

Speculation on Harper's demise should come as no surprise.

Last fall's federal election was his third kick at the electoral can that failed to produce a majority Conservative government.


Who are these senior conservatives? We are not told. We just get the old "senior conservative" whisper. We can not question them on their conservative credentials, because we do not know who they might be. Are they just entrepreneurs trying to sell their book? Or are they individuals that have an axe to grind, and do it by stealth, withholding their names from publication? Are they David Orchards, Keith Martins, Scott Brisons or Belinda Stronach type conservatives of convenience? We do not know.

Who are these conspirators?

Why do they constantly attack their own party, and not the Liberals who appointed a foreigner by intimidation?

Current polls show the Conservatives leading the Liberals by only a small margin nationally, while the popularity of Harper and his party in seat-rich Quebec have gone into the toilet.


Vote rich Quebec?? HA, that's funny! 75 seats, of which 35 to 40 are guaranteed separatist Bloq seats, that leaves maybe 40 open seats of which the Conservatives have 10. Is the Liberal Party of Toronto hoping to pick up 75 seats in Quebec? Remember Alberta/BC/Ont are due for some new seats.

That leaves only one obvious Conservative campaign spoiler from Quebec -- the current Liberal premier and former federal PC party leader, Jean Charest.

Sources close to Charest say he is not giving any thought to anything but running his province "for now," in part because his government is getting killed in the polls by the separatist Parti Quebecois.

But all that could change in a year.

Still only 50, Charest is into a record third term as premier, and likely wouldn't risk going for a fourth.

Charest versus Iggy for the keys to 24 Sussex -- now that would be a fun election.


DREAM on Weston, that will never happen, if it does you might be surprised how FUN the after election results just might be. Do you really take Canadians for idiots?

The conspirators...

...making up stuff about real Conservatives without really understanding what a Conservative is. I might be a fiscal and social Conservative (so I have been told), but that does not mean that I expect all my desires to be fulfilled by my party.

I am sick and tired of the SELF promoters with an agenda making trouble in my party. PM Harper is working with a minority government and all the sad little insecure people would rather slag him then support him and our party.

The conspirators....little people with little goals that do nothing to build the Conservative party. I have more respect for the Stronachs of politics then I do for these anony-mouse conspirators, at least the Stronach types crossed the floor, maybe these pretenders should as well. If you can not support PM Harper and the party, fine. Do not expect me to support you tearing down a party that I and many others have worked so hard to build. Get over yourselves. You are with us or against us, and slinking around pretending to be a conservative is demeaning to you and the party you pretend to support!

24 comments:

Bec said...

If these people do exist, I would equate them to Garth Turner, types.
Judas's, that settle for their sleazy agenda VS the will of the party.
In some cases, it is small c conservatives that whine the loudest but I don't think they are behind this chatter.
When the Charest thing comes up, I know it can't be anyone of importance. Charest, is about as popular with conservatives as Scott Brison.

maryT said...

In AB the liberals have lost the last 21 elections but they are still here. According to Weston shouldn't they have dried up and gone away. For the past 3 federal elections we have gained seats and the libs have lost seats, so who should fold up and go away. They have also changed leaders 3 times and it hasn't helped them.

Gabby in QC said...

"Does this mean the Conservative party will crack into two political entities? Not a chance. Nobody has any appetite to resurrect the internecine conservative political wars of the past."

The above was written by Gerry Nichols, who's been complaining about the Conservative party abandoning its conservative principles.

That is the only relevant message that I derived from his column.

There will always be malcontents who think a leader has gone too far or not far enough.

The ones I find most annoying, though, are the pretend-conservatives, who often slag the PM and his policies.

maryT said...

More conspiracy talk today at NNW, but there is also talk that the NDP should get a new leader also.
Get used to it, the more trouble iggy is in the media with try to switch the channel to trouble in the conservative party. Must not be working as they have added ndp to the mis.
For the next few hours we will be given the dirt on Brian. The inquiry is starting, and gee, it was announced that KS walked into the room by himself.

Martin said...

1 Alberta — 28 seats
2 British Columbia — 36 seats
3 Manitoba — 14 seats
4 New Brunswick — 10 seats
5 Newfoundland and Labrador — 7 seats
6 Northwest Territories - 1 seat
7 Nova Scotia — 11 seats
8 Nunavut — 1 seat
9 Ontario — 106 seats
10 Prince Edward Island — 4 seats
11 Quebec — 75 seats
12 Saskatchewan — 14 seats
13 Yukon — 1 seat

Do the math Einstein. Harper has failed repeatedly to capture a majority.

He will lose 8 or 9 seats in Quebec. He will lose 6 more in Atlantic Canada. He will lose 30 to 40 in Ontario and 10 more in BC.
Even if the 3 western provinces remain soldily blue, he's down at least 65 seats next election.

All is loses will go to the LPoC. Plus, they will pick up 20 more seats on top of what they gai from Harper in Quebec.

Put it altogether, Liberal majority.

Unknown said...

I'm so bored of your nonsense Hunter. Grow up.

Gabby in QC said...

"Charest versus Iggy for the keys to 24 Sussex -- now that would be a fun election."

All that Weston and other pundits do is think "election."
Maybe that's the only time those guys get to travel across the country, following the campaign they're assigned to.

There's been speculation before about Mr. Harper leaving the scene, and now this is more speculation about Charest. IMO, the latter lacks the kind of determination needed to lead a federal party.

maryT said...

To the real Wilson, we all know that wasn't you at 7.50a.m.
I hope some blog owner will expose this fake. Isn't identity theft against the law.
How many other blogs has this guy invaded using your name.

wilson said...

heh Hunter, I see my evil twin is at it again.

Charest is a Quebec nationalist now, I don't see him having a chance leading a federal party, given his bias to all things Quebec.

But the media would love to see the West attack a Quebecer, it makes for sensational headlines, and gives Iffy the upper hand in Quebec.

Oh Martin, to win an election, Liberals have to actually have policy.
What will Iffy run on?

Your Interm leader has NEVER won a leadership race in Canada.
Your Interm leader has NEVER authored policy, only fiction.
Your Interm leader has NEVER made a decision that he struck to, when pressed by opinion polls.

The Liberal brand...which is what?
More stimulus and a GST increase?
Coalition if necessary but not necessarily a coalition?

wilson said...

Funny thing Mary, TwitWilson has invaded 3 blogs, Sandy, Joanne and Hunter...the rocking women blogs!!

Unknown said...

I, too, am a woman. But you guys knew that right?

wilson said...

I'll leave it up to the blog owners if they want to delete TwitWilson comments,
doesn't bother me in the least.

TwitWilson is the one with an identity problem, harmless and obviously bored (and boring).

Gabby in QC said...

I was reluctant to post this comment, but on second thought, I guess I should. Why reluctant? Because I don't want the same thing that's happening to the real wilson to happen to anyone else, including me. Anyway, here goes:

I don't understand how someone can post with someone else's name.


Just out of curiosity, I clicked on the name "Wilson."


The Monday, March 30, 2009 7:50:00 AM and the Monday, March 30, 2009 8:52:00 AM person calling him/herself Wilson yielded this info when I clicked on the name:

"Profile Not Available

The Blogger Profile you requested cannot be displayed. Many Blogger users have not yet elected to publicly share their Profile.

If you're a Blogger user, we encourage you to enable access to your Profile."



However, clicking on the other Wilson, the one who uses a lower case "w" and posted comments at Monday, March 30, 2009 8:36:00 AM and Monday, March 30, 2009 8:37:00 AM yielded this info:

"User Stats

On Blogger Since 

December 2006

Profile Views
1,117"



I figured that is one way to determine who is the real person, if another such case crops up.



However, it appears that is not the case. To test my theory, I viewed my own profile, and was able to edit it without a password or any other check requested, which means anyone can conceivably "edit" someone else's profile. I hope that is not the case.

BTW, when I edited my profile (which had very little information to begin with) I got this information too, i.e. the same as the fake (?) Wilson:


"Profile Not Available

The Blogger Profile you requested cannot be displayed. Many Blogger users have not yet elected to publicly share their Profile. 

If you're a Blogger user, we encourage you to enable access to your Profile."



Maybe Blogger should be made aware of the problem of stolen identities.
Or maybe someone has another suggestion?

Anonymous said...

Gabby - rest assured that somebody cannot go in and edit your profile. Once you log in here to post your comments, you are automatically logged into Google - blog spot, gmail, etc. Until you actually log off from google, blogspot, or gmail, you are logged in - that is why you could edit your own profile without having to log in.

Anonymous said...

Gabby - I clicked on your name and it came up Profile Not Available.

Unknown said...

I am wilson. A paid blowhard who lives on the computer leaving absurdly pro-Harper rants at every turn.

Hear me, I am wilson. Professional blowhard.

liberal supporter said...

Despite the "liberal" use of the word troll to describe people who don't agree with you (not just here either), I prefer to reserve "troll" for people such as capital-W-Wilson, who is simply attempting to impersonate someone else. For anyone posting under a pseudonym, you can't really claim "identity theft" against someone else unless that identity can be construed as falling under trademark laws.

So the question as always is this: Is capital-W-Wilson some lefty trying to make small-w-wilson look bad, or is capital-W-Wilson actually a shill trying to make lefties look bad?


Gabby in QC: Go to the main page of any blog (such as this one) and look at the upper right corner of the browser window.

If it shows your email address that you signed up with, and "Dashboard" and "Sign out" in the upper right corner of the browser window, then you are logged in and you can change your profile.

Note that sometimes it doesn't show this, and instead says things about signing in, even though you are signed in.

Feel free to visit my profile and attempt to change it if you think it is possible. Please add to the "About me" to say "Gabby in Q.C. just proved that I am a bonehead who doesn't know what he is talking about" if you can!

Gabby in QC said...

"Feel free to visit my profile and attempt to change it if you think it is possible."

No, I wouldn't attempt to change anyone else's, even as a test. It wouldn't be nice - please don't fall off your chair laughing at me, but I'm old fashioned enough to think certain things are not "nice."
=====
East, thank you for the info. As I've stated elsewhere on various occasions, I'm not that tech-savvy, so I'm kind of nervous about people doing things just to be a nuisance.

I guess I'm especially wary because I received an email warning me about the "Confiker" virus that's being spread.

I just wish people would play by the rules - yes, discuss various topics, even disagree strongly, but without the silly tactics, and now this impersonation stuff.

Gabby in QC said...

Liberal supporter, you too, thanks for the info. I had never noticed the login, logout business that you described on the main page.

I sometimes wondered why the message under the comment box "You're currently posting as Gabby in QC" would disappear, and I'd have to go to my Google account and reset a password in order to be able to comment here.

A little lightbulb moment, thanks to you and East of Eden.

wilson said...

liberal supporter, I think TwitWilson simply and harmlessly wants to cause mischief.

But if he/she really wants to impersonate me, start digging sweetie, give me a hand!
Maybe we can team up keeping the media honest.

Gabby, I've never clicked onto my name before, 1117 hits, hmmm, I just hit it 3 times and the number didn't change...???

Gabby in QC said...

Wilson, it's true. I clicked on it twice too, and there was no change in the number either.

Why? I don't know - and maybe it's best to just leave this topic of "twins" aside; maybe that's the point of their interventions, to pull people off topic?

Unknown said...

2 wilsons, both twits...diabolical.

or maybe, just maybe there's only one true wilson and she happens to be off her meds again.

hunter said...

I see wilson has a friend. Southern Quebec is that you? Come out, come out whoever you are!

I suggest we ignore the faux Wilson, because I do not want to start deleting posts again or have to moderate comments, it's too difficult during the day when I am at work.

maryT said...

I warned Conservative Reporter about the fake Wilson, and sure enough twit turned up. CR did some checking and twit is from Toronto. She will post the name when she gets all info needed.