When the police are given instructions to just keep the peace it puts them in a very bad position. If the police would follow the rule of law instead, maybe we wouldn't need 1 billion for security during the G8 and G20 summits. No assault from any side should be overlooked in the hopes of keeping the peace. They tried that approach in Caladonia, and it didn't work.
You can not make one group "more equal" than another. The police have had their hands tied in Ontario, and it makes them look bad. We need to look at who is causing all the security problems, and why no organization is ever made to pay up for damage done by protesters. Freedom of speech is not just freedom for one side of an issue. First Nations can protest, Tamils can protest, Palestinians can protest, econuts can protest, everyone can protest, what they can not do is cause violence, like this:
I'm glad Blazing Cat Fur didn't get hurt, but where were the police when that nut job was blatantly crossing the road to confront him? This guy is involved with the CUPE union? What a shock. It's not the right that are the problem, it is the left that protest and cause trouble, then they wonder why their funding gets cut. This protest came courtesy of Palestine House, funded by taxpayer money. Cut off the money, NOW!
Monday, May 31, 2010
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Support For The Military Has Fizzled.
PM Harper started out strong with his visit to Afghanistan. Finally the troops were getting the equipment and support they needed and deserved. Canadians came out to Red Fridays to show their support, people began actively displaying their support for our troops for the first time in decades, the Highway of Heroes is a prime example of grass roots support, which thankfully is still going strong.
Then, it all fizzled. When is the last time that the Prime Minister has visited Afghanistan? I can't remember. All we hear now is that the mission will end in 2012. What a slap to the faces of our men and women who have poured their hearts, souls and in 146 cases their lives into our mission in Afghanistan. I am sickened by the opposition dictating to Parliament that our mission must end, but I am also just as disappointed with the Conservatives for not fighting it harder. Remember that the government DOES NOT have to consult Parliament on matters of national security, so if the government wanted to they could extend the mission.
I know Quebec doesn't support the mission, but they didn't support WWII either, so why are the Conservatives letting them have more power than they deserve? It's become all about votes, and that saddens me. Our troops should never be used as political pawns. The opposition has made them a political target, and the Conservatives are doing nothing to stand up for our troops.
The Conservatives distinguished themselves with their support for our troops early on, and the plans for the Arctic met with great support, but that has all fizzled, they are now no different than the opposition. They are so intent on winning a majority that they have forgotten what got them into power in the first place.
I am strongly supportive of our military, and I feel the Conservatives have abandoned them, I wonder how much more betrayed the people in the military feel. The opposition has been pounding our military for political gain, this is backfiring on them. Canadians are patriotic. We might not show it, but it is deeply ingrained in our identity.
I want the Conservatives to come out in support of our troops again. I do not want Canada to abandon the women and children of Afghanistan. I do not want us to cut and run. I do not want us to retreat like the opposition and Quebec want. Winning votes in Quebec is not worth it. Our troops have been in the toughest part of Afghanistan for years, and they have been making progress, now we are telling them that because it is not politically expedient, they must give up. It sucks. It makes my stomach churn with disgust. Disgust at all political parties, who are making our military a political target.
Our people in the military are human beings, not robots. They have families who love them, they have feelings. The opposition have done their best to smear them, and they are not allowed to fight back. It is up to us to show our support. Why isn't our government fighting for them anymore? Why are they allowing the opposition and media to define the issue? Maybe they should show Canadians the human side of our troops, like this video:
Maybe Conservative MP's should get back to their roots, and get the stale, poisoned Ottawa air out of their heads.
Then, it all fizzled. When is the last time that the Prime Minister has visited Afghanistan? I can't remember. All we hear now is that the mission will end in 2012. What a slap to the faces of our men and women who have poured their hearts, souls and in 146 cases their lives into our mission in Afghanistan. I am sickened by the opposition dictating to Parliament that our mission must end, but I am also just as disappointed with the Conservatives for not fighting it harder. Remember that the government DOES NOT have to consult Parliament on matters of national security, so if the government wanted to they could extend the mission.
I know Quebec doesn't support the mission, but they didn't support WWII either, so why are the Conservatives letting them have more power than they deserve? It's become all about votes, and that saddens me. Our troops should never be used as political pawns. The opposition has made them a political target, and the Conservatives are doing nothing to stand up for our troops.
The Conservatives distinguished themselves with their support for our troops early on, and the plans for the Arctic met with great support, but that has all fizzled, they are now no different than the opposition. They are so intent on winning a majority that they have forgotten what got them into power in the first place.
I am strongly supportive of our military, and I feel the Conservatives have abandoned them, I wonder how much more betrayed the people in the military feel. The opposition has been pounding our military for political gain, this is backfiring on them. Canadians are patriotic. We might not show it, but it is deeply ingrained in our identity.
I want the Conservatives to come out in support of our troops again. I do not want Canada to abandon the women and children of Afghanistan. I do not want us to cut and run. I do not want us to retreat like the opposition and Quebec want. Winning votes in Quebec is not worth it. Our troops have been in the toughest part of Afghanistan for years, and they have been making progress, now we are telling them that because it is not politically expedient, they must give up. It sucks. It makes my stomach churn with disgust. Disgust at all political parties, who are making our military a political target.
Our people in the military are human beings, not robots. They have families who love them, they have feelings. The opposition have done their best to smear them, and they are not allowed to fight back. It is up to us to show our support. Why isn't our government fighting for them anymore? Why are they allowing the opposition and media to define the issue? Maybe they should show Canadians the human side of our troops, like this video:
Maybe Conservative MP's should get back to their roots, and get the stale, poisoned Ottawa air out of their heads.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Friday Night Funnies: Breakfast At Ginger's
This is alarming
Beer contains female hormones! Yes, that's right, FEMALE hormones!
Last month, Montreal University and scientists released the results of a recent analysis that revealed the presence of female hormones in beer. Men should take a concerned look at their beer consumption. The theory is that beer contains female hormones (hops contain Phytoestrogens) and that by drinking enough beer, men turn into women.
To test the theory, 100 men each drank 8 schooners of beer within a one (1) hour period.
It was then observed that 100% of the test subjects, yes, 100% of all these men:-
1) Argued over nothing.
2) Refused to apologize when obviously wrong.
3) Gained weight.
4) Talked excessively without making sense.
5) Became overly emotional
6) Couldn't drive.
7) Failed to think rationally, and
8) Had to sit down while urinating.
No further testing was considered necessary!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E.T. Phone Home!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It has long been contended that there are male
jokes, female jokes and unisex jokes. Here is one I consider a
true female joke!
A woman was sitting at a bar enjoying an after work cocktail with her girlfriends when a tall, exceptionally handsome, extremely sexy, middle-aged man entered. He was so striking that the woman could not take her eyes off him.
The young-at-heart man noticed her overly attentive stare & walked directly towards her (as any man would). Before she could offer her apologies for staring so rudely, he leaned over & whispered to her, 'I'll do anything, absolutely anything, that you want me to do, no matter how kinky, for $20.00...On one condition'
Flabbergasted, the woman asked what the condition was. The man replied, 'You have to tell me what you want me to do in just three words.'
The woman considered his proposition for a moment & then slowly removed a $20 bill from her purse, which she pressed into the man's hand along with her address. She looked deeply into his eyes and slowly & meaningfully said....
'Clean my house.'
(YOU GO,GIRL!)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An Inspirational Golf Story.......
Recently I was asked to play in a golf tournament.
At first I said, "Naaahhh! I already play 3 times a week."
Then they said to me "Come on, it's for handicapped and blind kids."
Then I thought...
Shit, I could win this thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOT CELL PHONES...
OR THE RADIO...
OR THE GPS MONITOR...
NOT TALKING...
NOT TEXTING...
OR WATCHING A CAR VIDEO....
OR CHANGING CD's...
THE MOST FREQUENT CAUSES OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS ARE:
I'm applying for a government grant to study this problem more closely.
Wish me luck ..
"If I can save even one life...."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elderly Exercise Program
I tried it, I liked it, you will too!!
The older we get the more important it is to incorporate exercise into our daily routine. This is necessary to maintain cardiovascular health and maintain muscle mass..
If you're over 40, you might want to take it easy at first, then do more repetitions as you become more proficient and build stamina.
Always consult your doctor before starting any exercise program!
SCROLL DOWN..............
NOW SCROLL UP..
That's enough for the first day. Great job.
Have a glass of wine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
God and ideal husbands...
While creating Husbands, God promised Women that good and ideal Husbands would be found in all corners of the world.
And then he made the earth round.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On that note, have a great weekend. If it's raining out, here is your mindless game of the week...Mind My Bloody Beer...you might not want to try this if you are hungover from Friday night!
Thursday, May 27, 2010
If It Saves Even ONE Life, It Will Be Worth It!
Where have we heard that recently? Anyone? How about a standard lefty response to why the gun registry should not be scrapped. One billion and counting, and no proof that the registry has saved even one life. Now, one billion, hummm, where have I heard that today? Oh, right, security for the G8 and G20, is going to cost one billion (give or take a few million).
Going with lefty thinking....If it saves even ONE life, it will be worth it! That's not what they are saying? What, do they want protesters to burn more buildings? How about a suicide terrorist getting close enough to blow some diplomats up? Isn't a billion worth their safety?
Horrified and fearful??? Oh, grow up Susan Delacourt. Who is she quoting? None other than ....
Seriously we are supposed to listen to Coo-kier? If the lefties feel gun control is the way to save lives, then they should be thrilled that the government is spending money to make sure that at the G8 and G20, the only ones with guns will be the security forces.
Personally, I don't like the billion plus a YEAR that goes to the CBC, or the billion for the gun registry, or the billion for security during the G8/G20. Make the protesters pay for the costs of the extra security. After all, Ann Coulter had to pay for her protection against the lefty mob at the U of Losers. Why not make the protesters pay?
Freedom of speech, but not freedom of destruction. You break it, you pay for it!
Going with lefty thinking....If it saves even ONE life, it will be worth it! That's not what they are saying? What, do they want protesters to burn more buildings? How about a suicide terrorist getting close enough to blow some diplomats up? Isn't a billion worth their safety?
OTTAWA–Gun-control advocates say they are horrified and fearful that Canada's long-gun firearms registry is on the verge this week of being scrapped because the Conservatives may have enough support from the opposition to kill it.
Horrified and fearful??? Oh, grow up Susan Delacourt. Who is she quoting? None other than ....
Wendy Cukier, president of the Coalition for Gun Control, says her organization has been monitoring the progress of a Conservative private member's bill to abolish the registry and is now bracing for it to clear an important vote in the Commons on Wednesday.I would provide a link to Coalition for Gun Control, but I find it a creepy, still living in the 80's, blame everyone but the criminal site. You can find it for yourselves if you feel compelled to go there. It's about as enjoyable and biased as Rabble.
Seriously we are supposed to listen to Coo-kier? If the lefties feel gun control is the way to save lives, then they should be thrilled that the government is spending money to make sure that at the G8 and G20, the only ones with guns will be the security forces.
Personally, I don't like the billion plus a YEAR that goes to the CBC, or the billion for the gun registry, or the billion for security during the G8/G20. Make the protesters pay for the costs of the extra security. After all, Ann Coulter had to pay for her protection against the lefty mob at the U of Losers. Why not make the protesters pay?
Freedom of speech, but not freedom of destruction. You break it, you pay for it!
Labels:
Ann Coulter,
Cukier,
G20,
G8,
gun registry,
Protesters
Planting Time!
Posting will be sparse this week. I have work during the day, and 24 flats of flowers and veggies to plant in the evening.
Today, I read no newspapers and it's quite refreshing actually. With spring still trying to make it's appearance, it's time to wipe the cobwebs from the corners, open up the windows to let the fresh air in, and enjoy the birds singing at 4 in the morning. Okay, maybe not the birds singing at 4 in the morning, but getting back into working the soil, is a joy.
So, right now, I'm enjoying the weather, planting my flowers, and my veggie garden. Sometimes the simple life, without TV's and newspapers can be more rewarding but I still do not want to go back to the pioneer days, so the econuts can forget about me ever voting for them. I hear Toronto is dandelion heaven these days thanks to Dalton and the econuts. "Silent Spring" should be renamed to "Silent Killer".
Today, I read no newspapers and it's quite refreshing actually. With spring still trying to make it's appearance, it's time to wipe the cobwebs from the corners, open up the windows to let the fresh air in, and enjoy the birds singing at 4 in the morning. Okay, maybe not the birds singing at 4 in the morning, but getting back into working the soil, is a joy.
So, right now, I'm enjoying the weather, planting my flowers, and my veggie garden. Sometimes the simple life, without TV's and newspapers can be more rewarding but I still do not want to go back to the pioneer days, so the econuts can forget about me ever voting for them. I hear Toronto is dandelion heaven these days thanks to Dalton and the econuts. "Silent Spring" should be renamed to "Silent Killer".
Monday, May 24, 2010
Elevate Decorum? HA!
I like Micheal Chong, but I fear his private members bill is due to die. Why? The opposition don't want to be respectable. They want the "got you" moments caught on camera and broadcast on TV.
MP seeks to 'elevate decorum' of Question Period
Seriously, Nicholas stern? He has been discredited years ago. Why should the government respond to "knuckles grazing the floor"? That is despicable, and Rae deserved to be booed.
Jennings wasn't seriously expecting an answer, she has been one of the most vocal Liberals against Helena. Doesn't the Liberal pink book talk about "equality for women"? Yet it's okay to insinuate and smear. The media refuses to cover Liberal Lee for his "alleged" lobbying and Pablo for his arrest and "alleged" failure to blow...where are the MADD Mom's? Strangely quiet. Yet the media has made Helena's and Rahim's lives miserable.
I seriously hope MP's from ALL parties support this bill, but I don't think they will. They are too intent on getting back into power and will not want their "star" performances curtailed.
A better bill would have been to cancel immunity for ALL MP's in Question Period. This rule goes back before TV and blogs, it is obsolete, and MP's are used it to saying anything they want without fear of legal action. I also think they should stop reading off of a prepared card, if an MP has some issue for their constituency, they should be able to get up and ask a question. Cabinet Ministers should be able to answer whatever question gets thrown at them.
Elevate Decorum? How about paying more attention to your constituents, and less time smearing the government.
MP seeks to 'elevate decorum' of Question Period
Here's Liberal MP Bob Rae last week asking the government why it is not following the climate-change strategies proposed by people like British economist Nicholas Stern:
"Mr. Speaker, the government is living so far in the past it is not funny. Sir Nicholas Stern -
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
Hon. Bob Rae: Mr. Speaker, I am hearing a lot of heckling. I did not know 250 knuckles grazing the floor could make so much noise."
Seriously, Nicholas stern? He has been discredited years ago. Why should the government respond to "knuckles grazing the floor"? That is despicable, and Rae deserved to be booed.
Last week, Liberal MP Marlene Jennings asked the government what the RCMP was investigating in regards to former Cabinet minister Helena Guergis. Mr. Baird responded thusly: "Mr. Speaker, I am not going to speak for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. What I can do is speak as a member of the House of Commons. Why did the Liberal leader appoint a senior member of his caucus to the most important regulatory oversight committee, a man who is advertising himself as a paid lobbyist for foreign interests, specifically saying that he could get regulations changed?"
Jennings wasn't seriously expecting an answer, she has been one of the most vocal Liberals against Helena. Doesn't the Liberal pink book talk about "equality for women"? Yet it's okay to insinuate and smear. The media refuses to cover Liberal Lee for his "alleged" lobbying and Pablo for his arrest and "alleged" failure to blow...where are the MADD Mom's? Strangely quiet. Yet the media has made Helena's and Rahim's lives miserable.
(Mr. Chong has a bit of a history with taking stands on principle, having resigned as minister of intergovernmental affairs in 2006 because he disagreed with the motion that recognized the Québécois "nation.")
His motion, though, goes much further than suggesting that the Speaker be encouraged to metaphorically swing a bigger stick in the House. He suggests changing the rules around QP in order to eliminate the practice of having all questions vetted by the party whip and House leader; to set aside one day a week for the prime minister to be answerable in the House; to have other ministers available for two of the remaining four days; and to end the 35-second limit on answers that encourages snappy retorts and one-liners rather than thoughtful responses.
These measures are part of the same general theme: getting QP focused on "substantive issues more than political point-scoring," says Mr. Chong.
I seriously hope MP's from ALL parties support this bill, but I don't think they will. They are too intent on getting back into power and will not want their "star" performances curtailed.
A better bill would have been to cancel immunity for ALL MP's in Question Period. This rule goes back before TV and blogs, it is obsolete, and MP's are used it to saying anything they want without fear of legal action. I also think they should stop reading off of a prepared card, if an MP has some issue for their constituency, they should be able to get up and ask a question. Cabinet Ministers should be able to answer whatever question gets thrown at them.
Elevate Decorum? How about paying more attention to your constituents, and less time smearing the government.
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Statistically Speaking, Crime Is Decreasing Or Not!
Or, that's what the "progressives" keep telling us. Now why don't I believe the statistics? I don't know, it might be stories like these:
Body in barrel retrieved from Toronto harbour
Edmonton teen charged with murder
Two arrested after fatal assault in Ontario
Family shocked at LRT slaying
Just look at these headlines:
Is it any wonder that 80% of Edmontonians don't feel safe?
Quote statistics all you want, but the reality is that we "feel" less safe than we did before. "Progessives" should be able to relate to that, because it's about "feelings". Here's a statistic, if 80% of Edmontonians think Edmonton is becoming more violent, that means at least 30% of those people must be "progressives", so who is kidding who?
Funny, when just a few long weekend campers drink too much and cause problems, they BAN drinking in the national parks, but when a few protesters torch a bank, and destroy property, they yell "freedom of speech" and nobody BANS them from protesting. Here's a clue, if they are covering their faces, they are going to do something illegal, why else would you cover your face? Make all the organizations that protest pay for the extra police services needed because of them, Ann Coulter had to pay for her protection. Why should the taxpayers have to pay for it? We are not out there protesting, we are too busy working. Any damage to any buildings should be paid for by the protesters, whether it is their organizations who did the damage or not. You protest, you pay.
The "progressives" have campaigned to BAN smoking, guns, and now drinking, but they want legalized marijuana, prostitutes, and protesting that might get violent (think of what they cost us in police services). Then they talk about their values being "Canadian values"? Are they really that delusional?
Body in barrel retrieved from Toronto harbour
Edmonton teen charged with murder
Two arrested after fatal assault in Ontario
Family shocked at LRT slaying
Just look at these headlines:
Is it any wonder that 80% of Edmontonians don't feel safe?
Quote statistics all you want, but the reality is that we "feel" less safe than we did before. "Progessives" should be able to relate to that, because it's about "feelings". Here's a statistic, if 80% of Edmontonians think Edmonton is becoming more violent, that means at least 30% of those people must be "progressives", so who is kidding who?
Funny, when just a few long weekend campers drink too much and cause problems, they BAN drinking in the national parks, but when a few protesters torch a bank, and destroy property, they yell "freedom of speech" and nobody BANS them from protesting. Here's a clue, if they are covering their faces, they are going to do something illegal, why else would you cover your face? Make all the organizations that protest pay for the extra police services needed because of them, Ann Coulter had to pay for her protection. Why should the taxpayers have to pay for it? We are not out there protesting, we are too busy working. Any damage to any buildings should be paid for by the protesters, whether it is their organizations who did the damage or not. You protest, you pay.
The "progressives" have campaigned to BAN smoking, guns, and now drinking, but they want legalized marijuana, prostitutes, and protesting that might get violent (think of what they cost us in police services). Then they talk about their values being "Canadian values"? Are they really that delusional?
Hey, Or I Should Say Hay!
Here is a low cost solution to the oil spill.
Why not use hay?
Seeing how all the engineers haven't come up with a solution yet, maybe we should pay attention to these guys.
Meanwhile, Alberta continues to clean up Mother Nature's biggest oil spill.
Oh, and this is great....
.....
Diamond Estates is very smart. For only 110 bottles of wine a month, they have been getting lots of FREE media coverage.
Why not use hay?
Seeing how all the engineers haven't come up with a solution yet, maybe we should pay attention to these guys.
Meanwhile, Alberta continues to clean up Mother Nature's biggest oil spill.
Oh, and this is great....
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — Canadian soldiers and officers at Kandahar Airfield who prefer Pinot Noir to pilsner can now raise a glass with their beer-drinking buddies without having to pay for the privilege.
Each month, Canadian Forces personnel in Afghanistan are allowed two drinks. The beer comes at no cost, thanks to donations from breweries, but a half-bottle of vino costs $9.
.....
Canadians in Afghanistan consume about 82 bottles of wine per month, Johnson said. Diamond Estates is donating about 110 bottles per month, but Johnson isn't naive enough to think there will be any left over.
Diamond Estates is very smart. For only 110 bottles of wine a month, they have been getting lots of FREE media coverage.
Friday, May 21, 2010
Friday Night Funnies: Give Me Back My Dog!
A cowboy named Bud was overseeing his herd in a remote mountainous pasture in Alberta when suddenly a brand-new BMW advanced toward him out of a cloud of dust...
The driver, a young man in a Brioni suit, Gucci shoes,RayBan sunglasses and YSL tie, leaned out the window and asked the cowboy, "If I tell you exactly how many cows and calves you have in your herd, Will you give me a calf?"
Bud looks at the man, obviously a yuppie, then looks at his peacefully grazing herd and calmly answers, "Sure, Why not?"
The yuppie parks his car, whips out his Dell notebook computer, connects it to his Cingular RAZR V3 cell phone, and surfs to a NASA page on the Internet, where he calls up a GPS satellite to get an exact fix on his location which he then feeds to another NASA satellite that scans the area in an ultra-high-resolution photo.
The young man then opens the digital photo in Adobe Photoshop and exports it to an image processing facility in Hamburg , Germany .
Within seconds, he receives an email on his Palm Pilot that the image has been processed and the data stored. He then accesses an MS-SQL database through an ODBC connected Excel spreadsheet with email on his Blackberry and, after a few minutes, receives a response. Finally, he prints out a full-color, 150-page report on his hi-tech, miniaturized HP LaserJet printer,turns to the cowboy and says, "You have exactly 1,586 cows and calves..."
"That's right. Well, I guess you can take one of my calves," says Bud.
He watches the young man select one of the animals and looks on with amusement as the young man stuffs it into the trunk of his car.
Then Bud says to the young man, "Hey, if I can tell you exactly what your business is, will you give me back my calf?"
The young man thinks about it for a second and then says, "Okay, why not?"
"You're a Liberal Member of Parliament", says Bud.
"Wow! That's correct," says the yuppie, "but how did you guess that?"
"No guessing required." answered the cowboy. "You showed up here even though nobody called you; you want to get paid for an answer I already knew, to a question I never asked. You used millions of dollars worth of equipment trying to show me how much smarter than me you are; and you don't know a thing about how working people make a living - or about cows, for that matter. This is a herd of sheep.
Now give me back my dog.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Divorce or Murder
A nice, calm and respectable lady went into the pharmacy, walked
up to the pharmacist, looked straight into his eyes, and said, 'I
would like to buy some cyanide.'
The pharmacist asked 'Why in the world do you need cyanide?'
The lady replied, 'I need it to poison my husband.'
The pharmacist's eyes got big and he exclaimed, 'Lord have mercy!
I can't give you cyanide to kill your husband, That's against the law!
I'll lose my license! They'll throw both of us in jail! All kinds of
bad things will happen. Absolutely not! You CANNOT have any cyanide!'
The lady reached into her purse and pulled out a picture of her
husband in bed with the pharmacist's wife.
The pharmacist looked at the picture and replied, 'Well now, that's
different. You didn't tell me you had a prescription. '
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baby hedgehog....be prepared to say awwwwwwwww
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally - - An answer I can understand!
An American tourist asks a Newfoundlander:
"Why do Scuba divers always fall
backwards off their boats?"
To which the Newfoundlander replies:
"If they fell forwards they'd still be in the f----- boat"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Every parent can relate to this. All non-parents think you are just a bad parent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The President was looking for a call girl.
He found three such girls in a local pub, a blonde, a brunette and a redhead.
To the blonde he said,
'I'm the President of the United States,
Now how much would it cost me to spend some time with you?'
She replied, $200.'
To the brunette he asked the same question.
Her reply was $100.
He then asked the redhead..
Her reply was,
'Mr. President, if you can get my skirt up as high as my taxes, & my panties as low as my wages,
Get that thing of yours as hard as the times we are living in, and keep it rising like the price of gas,
Keep me warmer than it is in my apartment, and screw me the way you have the retirees,
Then it isn't going to cost you a damn cent !'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your mindless game for this weekend, "Sponge Bob Fight".
Have a great long weekend. Right now, I have 5, 14 year old kids having a sleep over....can you hear my screams.
Obama Do Your Job!
The socialists are using everything they can to make Arizona's law look like racial profiling, when in fact it is a law that mirrors the federal law. I wonder why the Obama administration would be demonizing the Arizona law? Apologizing to China for Arizona, letting Mexico's President demonize Arizona, letting California boycott Arizona, what is the point, what is the goal? When 70% of the American people support the Arizona law, what does Obama have to gain?
The Governor of Arizona speaks out. Obama do your job.
What does Obama have to gain? The votes of the illegals. So, to stay in power the Democrats are going to bribe the illegals with amnesty. Nice for the illegals, not so nice for the hard working taxpayers.
Special interest groups appear to have all the power. They don't, because the silent majority is watching, they are processing the information, and it is looking bleak for the "progressives" in November.
The Governor of Arizona speaks out. Obama do your job.
What does Obama have to gain? The votes of the illegals. So, to stay in power the Democrats are going to bribe the illegals with amnesty. Nice for the illegals, not so nice for the hard working taxpayers.
Special interest groups appear to have all the power. They don't, because the silent majority is watching, they are processing the information, and it is looking bleak for the "progressives" in November.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Because Of Illegal Immigrants...
Being a non-hyphenated Canadian, I get ticked off at immigrants who expect us to bend our rules to accommodate their culture. This can be worked out if everyone comes to the table with a love of Canada. Illegal immigrants are breaking the law, and should get no sympathy from Canadians, hyphenated or not. But this debate is getting carried to the next level in the US, and it is not pretty or fair to anyone anymore.
Tonight was a great indication of what is happening in the US. My husband was watching the Lakers game in Spanish! Seriously, he pointed it out to me, and I couldn't believe it, about five minutes later, the station fuzzed over, and then it came back in English. Was this done on purpose by the station, or was it just a broadcasting error?
What is apparent, is that progressives are pitting Americans against Americans, because of illegal immigrants. California is boycotting Arizona because of illegal immigrants, and Arizona is talking about California not getting power or water from them anymore, because of illegal immigrants. It reminds me of Quebec bashing Alberta for our oil sands and then grabbing the equalization money in their grubby hands, still yelling about how they deserve more for doing nothing.
The progressives tell us that the Arizona law will lead to racial profiling. The Arizona law clearly states that can't happen, it is modeled from the federal law, so why the outrage against this bill? Obama bashing his own people to China and Mexico, is a perfect representation of progressives. They really don't like America.
So how do Americans feel about the new law?
Maybe the progressives need to go back to the basement and rethink their plan.
Tonight was a great indication of what is happening in the US. My husband was watching the Lakers game in Spanish! Seriously, he pointed it out to me, and I couldn't believe it, about five minutes later, the station fuzzed over, and then it came back in English. Was this done on purpose by the station, or was it just a broadcasting error?
What is apparent, is that progressives are pitting Americans against Americans, because of illegal immigrants. California is boycotting Arizona because of illegal immigrants, and Arizona is talking about California not getting power or water from them anymore, because of illegal immigrants. It reminds me of Quebec bashing Alberta for our oil sands and then grabbing the equalization money in their grubby hands, still yelling about how they deserve more for doing nothing.
The progressives tell us that the Arizona law will lead to racial profiling. The Arizona law clearly states that can't happen, it is modeled from the federal law, so why the outrage against this bill? Obama bashing his own people to China and Mexico, is a perfect representation of progressives. They really don't like America.
So how do Americans feel about the new law?
An Arizona utilities official is threatening to switch off the electricity the state sends to Los Angeles in response to the city council's vote to boycott the state in protest of its new illegal immigration law. Do you agree with the fight-boycott-with-boycott response?
Maybe the progressives need to go back to the basement and rethink their plan.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Wear A Burka Day!
I know that wearing a burka wouldn't even be noticed in Saudi Arabia, but how about in North America? If we can have a boob quake, how about a burka bonanza? Let's all wear a burka for a day, and that means you guys too!
Why should we do that? I have been interested in how it would feel to be walking around only showing your eyes. I suspect it is a lot like getting dressed up for Halloween. I am always a witch at Halloween, and as I get dressed up, my personality changes, until I'm acting the part of a witch. Look at Marti Gras, once people are masked, they relax their morals, and do things they normally wouldn't do. A burka is a big mask that women hide behind.
The thing is, after Halloween, I don't go around in my witches costume, it gets packed away in a trunk until next year. Most importantly, by reverting to the normal dress of our society, I fit back in and can truly be myself, not some made up character.
Why would a woman choose to hide behind a burka? It is not a religious requirement of their religion, so why wear it here in Canada and risk being stared at or worse?
I personally think is as a form of oppression. I might wear a witches costume for a few hours, but by then I am tired of playing a role and want back into my sweats. Do the women who wear burkas feel the same?
I think the best way to gain prospective on this issue is to wear a burka for a day. I want to see all our MP's wearing them during question period, not to mock them, but to let them see what women who are forced into wearing them must feel. They have all sorts of days on Parliament Hill, like woman's day, and international day of the child, why not burka day?
I suggest an international burka day, in solidarity with all the women out there who are forced to wear them. Oh, and only black burkas would be allowed, anyone daring to wear a blue burka would be subject to big fines. Let's wear a burka for a day and see how we feel being stared at and maybe worse, only then can we formulate a law for Canada.
Monday, May 17, 2010
Post Expense Records ONLINE To Keep MP's INLINE!
If MP's should have the right to look at all military documents in a time of war and potentially cause the troops harm, why can't the taxpayers see the same MP's expense reports?
Something smells bad here. Why aren't the Liberals and NDP shouting about the lack of accountability if MP's expense reports aren't audited by Sheila Fraser? They should be at the Conservatives throats over this issue. Instead we get this garbage from a Liberal MP....
Let's use his argument and turn it to the Afghan issue....
If [documents] were opened to the MP's and open to the public, all of a sudden people would jump to conclusions without having all the facts.
It's apparently a win for DEMOCRACY when the MP's get to see all the documents regarding the Afghan war, but DEMOCRACY would be distorted if the taxpayer got to see what MP's are spending our money on. Silence.
I can understand why the Conservatives would be reluctant to allow the audit. Our biased media would only report on supposed Conservative wrong doings, and give the opposition parties a pass. If you doubt me, why hasn't the media reported on Liberal MP Pablo? Why hasn't CBC or CTV been hammering on his accident where he failed to blow, and was therefore arrested? How about Pat Martins assistant yelling and protesting at the Ann Coulter lecture? Silence.
Given that the media is on the oppositions side, why is the opposition fighting an audit of their expense accounts? They have the majority at committee, they could order it done, but they refuse to allow the audit. What are our MP's hiding? Where is the transparency? The accountability? Silence.
If the opposition is so sure that those Afghan documents are necessary for an understanding of what went on during a war, why are they hiding their expense account documents? Maybe the Speaker needs to rule on this issue, the same way he ruled on the last one...open up the books, it is the taxpayers rights that are being trampled here.
I guess the opposition thinks a witch hunt to find an Afghan hit with a shoe is more important than taxpayers finding out that we have been hit with bricks.
So, if the opposition can whine and use Parliament as a tool to get documents for purely political reasons, then taxpayers want Parliament to do the same with our MP's.
Open up the books! We are not talking chump change here, we are talking about $500,000,000! See all those zeros, that's our money, and we have no clue how it is being spent. Let Sheila audit those books! This refusal looks bad on all parties. I guess the opposition can't find a way to make it so that only the Conservative MP's would be audited, if they could, they would be demanding that Sheila Fraser get a look at the expense accounts. Seeing as how every MP would be treated as equal, they are opposing it.
MP's should post their expense records online, that might keep them inline!!
Something smells bad here. Why aren't the Liberals and NDP shouting about the lack of accountability if MP's expense reports aren't audited by Sheila Fraser? They should be at the Conservatives throats over this issue. Instead we get this garbage from a Liberal MP....
MPs, Mr. Szabo explained to a reporter, get sued a lot -- for sexual harrassment and wrongful dismissal, for example -- and naturally they have to fight, settle or pay out these lawsuits on the taxpayers' dime. “If [expenses] were opened to the Auditor General and open to the public, all of a sudden people would jump to conclusions without having all the facts,” he said. “If you identify the member, or the law firm or all this other stuff, all of a sudden people could say ... what’s wrong with this member, this member is getting sued all the time.”
Let's use his argument and turn it to the Afghan issue....
If [documents] were opened to the MP's and open to the public, all of a sudden people would jump to conclusions without having all the facts.
It's apparently a win for DEMOCRACY when the MP's get to see all the documents regarding the Afghan war, but DEMOCRACY would be distorted if the taxpayer got to see what MP's are spending our money on. Silence.
I can understand why the Conservatives would be reluctant to allow the audit. Our biased media would only report on supposed Conservative wrong doings, and give the opposition parties a pass. If you doubt me, why hasn't the media reported on Liberal MP Pablo? Why hasn't CBC or CTV been hammering on his accident where he failed to blow, and was therefore arrested? How about Pat Martins assistant yelling and protesting at the Ann Coulter lecture? Silence.
Given that the media is on the oppositions side, why is the opposition fighting an audit of their expense accounts? They have the majority at committee, they could order it done, but they refuse to allow the audit. What are our MP's hiding? Where is the transparency? The accountability? Silence.
If the opposition is so sure that those Afghan documents are necessary for an understanding of what went on during a war, why are they hiding their expense account documents? Maybe the Speaker needs to rule on this issue, the same way he ruled on the last one...open up the books, it is the taxpayers rights that are being trampled here.
I guess the opposition thinks a witch hunt to find an Afghan hit with a shoe is more important than taxpayers finding out that we have been hit with bricks.
So, if the opposition can whine and use Parliament as a tool to get documents for purely political reasons, then taxpayers want Parliament to do the same with our MP's.
Open up the books! We are not talking chump change here, we are talking about $500,000,000! See all those zeros, that's our money, and we have no clue how it is being spent. Let Sheila audit those books! This refusal looks bad on all parties. I guess the opposition can't find a way to make it so that only the Conservative MP's would be audited, if they could, they would be demanding that Sheila Fraser get a look at the expense accounts. Seeing as how every MP would be treated as equal, they are opposing it.
MP's should post their expense records online, that might keep them inline!!
Too Tired To Think!
I was busy all day; planting flowers, making potato salad, and doing some work with the puppy, so this will be a short post, as I am bone tired.
I think PM Harper is doing an excellent job of representing our country. I have a deep respect for his ability to unite the right and make it work. (and to my trolls, NO that does not mean I am sexually attracted to him, idiots) The left is babbling on about the "religious" right take over of the PMO. Bad Christians, you have morals, and therefore can not have a voice.
I have never gone over to some lefties blog and told them what they should believe. I could care less what they believe, unless it impacts me and my family. I can not understand why lefties feel compelled to come to Conservative blogs and try to "straighten" our thinking out. Why do they bother if we are so wrong?
As summer approaches, the media will have nothing to write about on the political scene, except PM Harper and the G8/G20. I wonder what stupid scandal the Liberals will come up with to take any positive attention away from the Conservatives. Hey Conservative MP's, be extra careful now, the Liberal media are on a hunt for some 30 year old video of you drinking a beer.
With the media losing their power, and the lefties wondering around bumping into each other, I predict next election gives the Conservatives a majority. Voters are not as dumb as the MSM and lefties think they are, so bring it on, I'm getting bored with faux scandals, and opposition incompetence. Wait until the fall though, our summers are way too short to be wasting them going door knocking.
PM Harper, an outstanding political mind and principled family man. We are very lucky for his leadership right now, look at Greece, or Quebec and you can see where we might have been without Preston Manning and now, PM Harper.
I think PM Harper is doing an excellent job of representing our country. I have a deep respect for his ability to unite the right and make it work. (and to my trolls, NO that does not mean I am sexually attracted to him, idiots) The left is babbling on about the "religious" right take over of the PMO. Bad Christians, you have morals, and therefore can not have a voice.
I have never gone over to some lefties blog and told them what they should believe. I could care less what they believe, unless it impacts me and my family. I can not understand why lefties feel compelled to come to Conservative blogs and try to "straighten" our thinking out. Why do they bother if we are so wrong?
As summer approaches, the media will have nothing to write about on the political scene, except PM Harper and the G8/G20. I wonder what stupid scandal the Liberals will come up with to take any positive attention away from the Conservatives. Hey Conservative MP's, be extra careful now, the Liberal media are on a hunt for some 30 year old video of you drinking a beer.
With the media losing their power, and the lefties wondering around bumping into each other, I predict next election gives the Conservatives a majority. Voters are not as dumb as the MSM and lefties think they are, so bring it on, I'm getting bored with faux scandals, and opposition incompetence. Wait until the fall though, our summers are way too short to be wasting them going door knocking.
PM Harper, an outstanding political mind and principled family man. We are very lucky for his leadership right now, look at Greece, or Quebec and you can see where we might have been without Preston Manning and now, PM Harper.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Support For Israel Is Bad?
I refuse to link to any article that is promoting a lefty book by an air head, but I will link to Ezra's take on the issue.
What bothers me about this is the amount of attention the media is paying to an author who is bashing Christians. I am a Catholic, and I vote Conservative, but I do so because the Conservatives line up best with my beliefs and morals. I do not try to convert anyone to become Catholic and I do not promote voting Conservative BECAUSE you are Christian.
I do not agree with abortion, swingers, carbon taxes, big government, the gun registry, the wheat board monopoly, legalizing drugs or prostitution, euthanasia, and many other things the left promotes. Being Christian will help me to decide what party to vote for and I see nothing wrong with that. It is who I am and what I believe.
My parents are Catholic, and they vote Liberal, maybe the author can explain that? Are all lefties non-Christians? Obviously not. So, why demonize Christians? Guess they are easy targets for the left because they turn the other cheek.
What bothers me about this is the amount of attention the media is paying to an author who is bashing Christians. I am a Catholic, and I vote Conservative, but I do so because the Conservatives line up best with my beliefs and morals. I do not try to convert anyone to become Catholic and I do not promote voting Conservative BECAUSE you are Christian.
I do not agree with abortion, swingers, carbon taxes, big government, the gun registry, the wheat board monopoly, legalizing drugs or prostitution, euthanasia, and many other things the left promotes. Being Christian will help me to decide what party to vote for and I see nothing wrong with that. It is who I am and what I believe.
My parents are Catholic, and they vote Liberal, maybe the author can explain that? Are all lefties non-Christians? Obviously not. So, why demonize Christians? Guess they are easy targets for the left because they turn the other cheek.
Friday, May 14, 2010
Friday Night Funnies: Happy Birthday Son!
Today, my eldest son turned 17. He is an awesome young man. He is going to join the reserves this summer, he is aces at learning Japanese, and he was asked to join the schools jazz band. He plays a mean trombone! Next week he goes to Seattle with the concert band, it should be a great time. So, Stretch, you are a young man now, and it looks good on you. You make me proud, SON. Enough mushy stuff, on to the funnies...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROFOUND MOURNING.....
A man placed some flowers on the grave of his dearly
departed mother and started back toward his car,
when his attention was diverted
to another man
kneeling at a grave.
The man seemed to be praying with profound
intensity and kept repeating,
"Why did you have to die?
Why did you have to die?"
The first man approached him and said,
"Sir, I don't wish to interfere with your private grief,
but this demonstration of pain is more than I've ever seen.
For whom do you mourn so deeply?
A child?
A parent?"
The mourner took a moment to collect himself,then replied,
"My wife's first husband."
(Lefties....think about it!)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The anti-Christ/religion people probably don't think this is funny, but this Catholic does.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Undies
Little Susie goes home from school and tells her mom that the boys keep
asking her to do cartwheels because she's very good at doing them.
Mom said: "YOU should say NO--they only want to look at your undies."
Susie said: "I know they do...that's why I hide them in my backpack!!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One sunny day in January, 2013 an old man approached the White House from across Pennsylvania Avenue , where he'd been sitting on a park bench. He spoke to the U.S. Marine standing guard and said, "I would like to go in and meet with President Obama."
The Marine looked at the man and said, "Sir, Mr. Obama is no longer president and no longer resides here."
The old man said, "Okay", and walked away.
The following day, the same man approached the White House and said to the same Marine, "I would like to go in and meet with President Obama."
The Marine again told the man, "Sir, as I said yesterday, Mr. Obama is no longer president and no longer resides here."
The man thanked him and, again, just walked away.
The third day, the same man approached the White House and spoke to the very same U.S. Marine, saying "I would like to go in and meet with President Obama."
The Marine, understandably agitated at this point, looked at the man and said, "Sir, this is the third day in a row you have been here asking to speak to Mr. Obama. I've told you already that Mr. Obama is no longer the president and no longer resides here. Don't you understand?"
The old man looked at the Marine and said, "Oh, I understand. I just love hearing it."
The Marine snapped to attention, saluted, and said, "See you tomorrow, Sir."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Lord,
I know that I haven't talked to you that much, but this past year you have taken away my favourite actor, Patrick Swayze, my favourite actress, Farah Fawcett, and my favourite musician, Michael Jackson.
I just wanted to let you know that my favourite premiers are Campbell and McGuinty.
Amen
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single Black Female
This has to be one of the best singles ads ever printed. It is reported to have been listed in the Atlanta Journal.
SINGLE BLACK FEMALE seeks male companionship, ethnicity unimportant. I'm a very good girl who LOVES to play. I love long walks in the woods, riding in your pickup truck, hunting, camping and fishing trips, cozy winter nights lying by the fire. Candlelight dinners will have me eating out of your hand. I'll be at the front door when you get home from work, wearing only what nature gave me... Call (404) 875-6420 and ask for Annie, I'll be waiting.....
Over 150 men found themselves talking to the Atlanta Humane Society.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a great weekend, it is supposed to be over 20C everyday this weekend....getting the golf clubs out and heading for the driving range! Plus, I have a lot of plants that need to get in the ground.
This Speaks On So Many Levels!
I have nothing to say. Read it, and think about it for a few hours, or days. This is not just about a murder, it is about a culture, that we are busy importing into our country. I makes me very uneasy.
Very, very sad and disturbing.
PS for more on Mo Strong go on over to Spin Assassin and watch those You-tube videos. That is also very disturbing.
Suspicion: Palestinian killed wife because she was carrying girl
Police say West Bank Palestinian choked wife to death over ultrasound results; relatives say he was jealous of brother, who has nine sons
Ali Waked
Published: 05.13.10, 14:18 / Israel News
Palestinian police in the West Bank city of Nablus arrested a man on suspicion that he murdered his pregnant wife Wednesday night because an ultrasound examination showed that she was carrying a girl.
The couple has four children – three boys and a girl – and the father wanted another son.
Palestinian police officials said the argument that followed the ultrasound test was just one of many and that it was not the sole reason behind the murder in the village of Nasiriyah, located north of Nablus.
According to police, abrasions were found on the man's body, indicating that the wife struggled as he was choking her to death.
Family members said the husband had tried to kill his wife following a previous ultrasound examination. Relatives said the suspect was envious of his brother, who has nine sons. They said the husband had beaten his wife in the days prior to the murder.
Very, very sad and disturbing.
PS for more on Mo Strong go on over to Spin Assassin and watch those You-tube videos. That is also very disturbing.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Spotlight Put On Mo Strong!
Mo Strong is currently hiding away in China, that beacon of light on climate change. They are the model that all countries should follow. No pollution, no factories spewing particulates into the atmosphere, excellent sewage systems, wind power over coal power, it's a utopia! Or econuts and progressive think so, because they want us to send mega bucks to China because it is a third world "developing" country.
Today, Glenn Beck put the spotlight on Mo Strong. He called for people to research Mo Strong and find out about global governance.
It appears to be paying off. Let the light shine down on the climate change clowns! Mo Strong is responsible for the Kyoto Accord, he is wealthy because of it. Funny how the econuts love this capitalist.
Then we have this little gem from back in the 70's.
Luckily Canadians already know all about Mo and his money sucking schemes.
Obama's team has changed the "climate change bill" to "America's Power Act". Just like the econuts changed "global warming" to "climate change". It is still "cap and trade" by any other name. This on a day when the UN Ban Ban Man came to Canada and lectured us on our environmental record. Go back to the Useless Nations Ban Ban.
Mo Strong is an elitist progressive who is making money off of people's ignorance. He hides in the dark, in a country with NO human rights, NO democracy, and sucks the money out of your pockets. The spotlight is now on him, thanks to Glenn Beck. It should be interesting to watch how the blogsphere takes on his challenge. This is my small effort.
Today, Glenn Beck put the spotlight on Mo Strong. He called for people to research Mo Strong and find out about global governance.
It appears to be paying off. Let the light shine down on the climate change clowns! Mo Strong is responsible for the Kyoto Accord, he is wealthy because of it. Funny how the econuts love this capitalist.
@glennbeck Where on Earth Are We Going? ~ Maurice Strong (Author) amzn.to/9N8gWd. @esp. Surprise Maurice Strong is on the Chicago climate exchange board of directors.Getting rich with Al Gore what a scheme.
“Maurice F. Strong, PC, CC, OM, FRSC (born April 29, 1929) is a Canadian businessman. He is a Canadian expatriate, entrepreneur, environmentalist, and one of the world’s leading proponents of the United Nations’s involvement in…
Maurice Strong is a board member of the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX). He is a former Secretary General of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and a leading architect of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, an international agr…
George Soros and his Canadian sidekick, Kyoto architect Maurice Strong, are the brains behind the likes of Al Gore, Mikhail Gorbachev and Barak Obama, all who belong to the above and the “Chicago Climate Exchange” which will m…
Then we have this little gem from back in the 70's.
Luckily Canadians already know all about Mo and his money sucking schemes.
Mr. Strong quite blatantly promotes eco dictatorship. He declares that “Our concept of ballot-box democracy may need to be modified to produce strong governments capable of making difficult decisions, particularly in terms of safeguarding the global environment.” He suggests that the world be run like a giant corporation: “[W]e must learn to manage our impact on the environment much as we manage our businesses — with amortization, maintenance, and depreciation accounts — to ensure continued sustainability.”
This claim would be ridiculous even if Mr. Strong had not been the architect of so many private business messes. Still, he realizes that if there is only one global “corporation” then its customers have nowhere else to go.
Obama's team has changed the "climate change bill" to "America's Power Act". Just like the econuts changed "global warming" to "climate change". It is still "cap and trade" by any other name. This on a day when the UN Ban Ban Man came to Canada and lectured us on our environmental record. Go back to the Useless Nations Ban Ban.
Mo Strong is an elitist progressive who is making money off of people's ignorance. He hides in the dark, in a country with NO human rights, NO democracy, and sucks the money out of your pockets. The spotlight is now on him, thanks to Glenn Beck. It should be interesting to watch how the blogsphere takes on his challenge. This is my small effort.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
I Sense A Pattern Here!
We have pirates and we have immigrants and we have killings of pirates and immigrants. Now this pattern is very disturbing, and something has to be done about it.
What am I talking about? The pattern of crime by a people who come here and somehow expect us to solve their problems.
We start in their "homeland", Somalia.
-A third of the population depends on food aid
-No effective government since 1991
-Islamist militia and UN-backed transitional government compete for control of country
The self-proclaimed state of Somaliland and the region of Puntland run their own affairs
Since 1991 this country has been in crisis. So, what do they do? Immigrate or become pirates. How is that working for them? Not good. Who do they blame? Canada.
It appears that some countries are taking the pirates to task, and disappearing them.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. We should feel sorry for the pirates because their country is in ruins, they have no government and food is in short supply, so they are only doing what they need to survive.
So, the country is in chaos. Pirates are holding private companies for ransom, and the UN is USELESS as per usual. If I lived in that country, I would try to immigrate. Some come to Canada. What do they do? It appears drugs have something to do with over 30 kids murdered in Edmonton alone. The last one was a Somali from Toronto via Somalia, in Fort Mac maybe selling drugs. I guess Muslims don't drink but drugs are okay.
Watch this video.
The guy was from Toronto, charged with selling cocaine, he goes to Fort Mac and gets killed by a rival gang, and it's Canada's fault. Edmonton's fault? How about the sister-in-law taking some responsibility for what he was doing. Why are all those Somali males dying? Do they think we are stupid? Do they think that they have no responsibility for their own people?
Finally, if immigrants come to Canada from war torn areas, they need to understand that they should leave their wars behind. I want to feel sympathetic towards the Somali people here in Edmonton, but I can't. Why have over 30 young Somali males died? Just a guess, but maybe drugs have something to do with it.
I have two young kids, and if I knew that anyone was trying to sell them drugs, I would do everything I could to get those creeps in jail. I will do anything I need to keep my kids safe. Why don't the Somali Mom's do the same thing? They want a task force? How about keeping your kids in school (it's free) so that they don't have to sell drugs. If you are a tight knit community, then you know who is selling drugs, tell the police.
I resent the fact that they come to Canada and bring their tribal wars with them. Then they expect us to solve their problems. You don't need a task force, you need to control your kids. It is not our problem. It is your culture that is the problem. I refuse to accept your culture in my country. You want to save your children? Leave your wars behind, and learn to love Canada.
What am I talking about? The pattern of crime by a people who come here and somehow expect us to solve their problems.
We start in their "homeland", Somalia.
-A third of the population depends on food aid
-No effective government since 1991
-Islamist militia and UN-backed transitional government compete for control of country
The self-proclaimed state of Somaliland and the region of Puntland run their own affairs
Since 1991 this country has been in crisis. So, what do they do? Immigrate or become pirates. How is that working for them? Not good. Who do they blame? Canada.
It appears that some countries are taking the pirates to task, and disappearing them.
MOSCOW, Russia — Following high level complaints about "imperfections" in international law, Russia announced Tuesday that captured Somali pirates "have all died." A Russian official claimed that 10 pirates seized by Russian special forces aboard an oil tanker last week were quickly freed but then died on their way back to the Somali coast.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. We should feel sorry for the pirates because their country is in ruins, they have no government and food is in short supply, so they are only doing what they need to survive.
With the backing of Ethiopian troops, forces loyal to the interim administration seized control from the Islamists at the end of 2006.
Islamist insurgents - including the Al-Shabab group, which later declared allegiance to al-Qaeda - fought back against the government and Ethiopian forces, regaining control of most of southern Somalia by late 2008.
Ethiopia pulled its troops out in January 2009. Soon after, Al-Shabab fighters took control of Baidoa, formerly a key stronghold of the transitional government.
So, the country is in chaos. Pirates are holding private companies for ransom, and the UN is USELESS as per usual. If I lived in that country, I would try to immigrate. Some come to Canada. What do they do? It appears drugs have something to do with over 30 kids murdered in Edmonton alone. The last one was a Somali from Toronto via Somalia, in Fort Mac maybe selling drugs. I guess Muslims don't drink but drugs are okay.
Watch this video.
The guy was from Toronto, charged with selling cocaine, he goes to Fort Mac and gets killed by a rival gang, and it's Canada's fault. Edmonton's fault? How about the sister-in-law taking some responsibility for what he was doing. Why are all those Somali males dying? Do they think we are stupid? Do they think that they have no responsibility for their own people?
Finally, if immigrants come to Canada from war torn areas, they need to understand that they should leave their wars behind. I want to feel sympathetic towards the Somali people here in Edmonton, but I can't. Why have over 30 young Somali males died? Just a guess, but maybe drugs have something to do with it.
I have two young kids, and if I knew that anyone was trying to sell them drugs, I would do everything I could to get those creeps in jail. I will do anything I need to keep my kids safe. Why don't the Somali Mom's do the same thing? They want a task force? How about keeping your kids in school (it's free) so that they don't have to sell drugs. If you are a tight knit community, then you know who is selling drugs, tell the police.
I resent the fact that they come to Canada and bring their tribal wars with them. Then they expect us to solve their problems. You don't need a task force, you need to control your kids. It is not our problem. It is your culture that is the problem. I refuse to accept your culture in my country. You want to save your children? Leave your wars behind, and learn to love Canada.
Monday, May 10, 2010
We Choose Life!
On Thursday, the March FOR Life will take place all across North America. Expect lots of news coverage by CBC and CTV....or not.
It is a celebration of life, not for death. Do the pro-choice people rally for abortion? Iggy can't even say the word abortion, yet he is trying to pound the Conservatives for their support of life. He needs to look at his MP's, they are the ones that scuttled his own bill. No money for abortions overseas.
I will be at the Edmonton celebration of life. I hope that the cold hearts of women who use abortion as a method of birth control, will melt towards their babies. Maybe if they listen to this youngster, they might change their minds.
She is a very brave young lady. Of course the fembots do not dare challenge her, because she is right. Abortion is wrong. It does not empower women, it makes them weaker. Feminists should be outraged that men are telling/forcing women to kill their female babies because they are considered to be nothing, while boy babies are precious and desired. Our society is sick.
Feminists are trying to pressure the government to support abortions in Africa, whether African women want it or not. They already have everything they could want in Canada, babies can be killed even as they are being born. I challenge any feminist to explain to me how this is right. How does killing a baby empower you. My body, my choice, is a juvenile response to a very serious and deadly problem.
So, go out there on Thursday, and celebrate life. Thank your Mother for caring enough about you to give you life. Pray for those who have chosen to abort their babies, the guilt must be enormous. Teach your children the consequences of having sex, especially unprotected sex. Sex for the sake of sex, is an empty vessel. Love and commitment is fulfilling and magical. A baby is not something to be discarded like garbage. Support life. Choose Life!
For more information, go here.
Proof That Lefties Support Taliban Bombers!
The NP has an article about Afghan detainees. It appears that Canadians are buying into the detainee issue....or are they?
First off, I can't find the survey the NP is quoting. The newest released data at Ipsos Reid is whether the opposition can be trusted. In order to view the results, you need to pony up $95 a year.
So, not having the actual questions, I'm going to play with statistics.
Question 1: Given that the Afghan Muslims stone women to death for being raped, do you think that Afghan prisoners are tortured?
(Hint, you have to answer yes to this question)
Question 2: If our Canadian troops hand over captured Taliban who are prone to chopping off woman's heads, do you think they might be tortured by Afghans?
(Hint, you have to answer yes)
Question 3: Given that the Taliban throw acid in young girls faces for going to school, do you think that they might be tortured?
(Hint, you have to answer yes)
Question 4: Do you "care deeply" that murdering detainees might be tortured by the Afghans?
(Hint, you only care if you are Taliban lovers and could care less about young Afghan girls)
Question 5: If your daughter was raped and then sentenced to death, do you believe in the Afghan government as a way to protect your child?
(Do you seriously need a hint for this one?)
Question 6: If you send troops into a desert fight in green camo, should the Minister be responsible?
(Hint, it was the Liberals who did this)
Question 7: If officials knew back in 2001, when the troops where first sent over to Afghanistan that torture was the norm, should the Liberals be held to account?
(Hint, the press have a short memory and therefore they blame everything on the Conservatives, and ignore the FACT that it was the Liberals who had a bad transfer agreement and it was the Conservatives who fixed it).
This poll appears to be very biased, but I can't really tell because the results would cost me $95, and I'm not one of those rich Liberal bloggers who can afford to see the results.
This poll proves that lefties support Taliban Bombers, and think women killed for minor "crimes" do not matter. It is a sad statement of our lefty people, they used to support the down trodden, now they support terrorists. Is it fear?
OTTAWA - A solid majority of Canadians believe prisoners detained by Canadian soldiers have been tortured after being transferred to Afghan authorities, a new Ipsos Reid poll suggests.
A fat majority also say that if torture occurred, it was not only wrong but that they believe there was widespread knowledge of it within the Canadian government -- and that senior officials should lose their jobs, if that was the case.
First off, I can't find the survey the NP is quoting. The newest released data at Ipsos Reid is whether the opposition can be trusted. In order to view the results, you need to pony up $95 a year.
So, not having the actual questions, I'm going to play with statistics.
Question 1: Given that the Afghan Muslims stone women to death for being raped, do you think that Afghan prisoners are tortured?
(Hint, you have to answer yes to this question)
Question 2: If our Canadian troops hand over captured Taliban who are prone to chopping off woman's heads, do you think they might be tortured by Afghans?
(Hint, you have to answer yes)
Question 3: Given that the Taliban throw acid in young girls faces for going to school, do you think that they might be tortured?
(Hint, you have to answer yes)
Pollster John Wright said Canadians are saying they "care deeply" about the possibility of detainees being tortured after Canadian soldiers have transferred them to Afghan custody.
"They're saying it's not proper, it should have stopped and, if it didn't, somebody should have done something about it," he said.
Of the 61% who believe torture occurred, 59% said they think the tactic was routine, compared to 34% who believe it happened only on rare occasions, the poll suggests.
Quebecers were more likely to believe transferred detainees were tortured. Seventy-six per cent of them took that position, whereas residents of Alberta were the least likely to believe it, at 44%.
Question 4: Do you "care deeply" that murdering detainees might be tortured by the Afghans?
(Hint, you only care if you are Taliban lovers and could care less about young Afghan girls)
Question 5: If your daughter was raped and then sentenced to death, do you believe in the Afghan government as a way to protect your child?
(Do you seriously need a hint for this one?)
A majority said that if it is determined that officials knew as far back as 2007 that torture was taking place and didn't do anything to stop it, or denied it was happening at all, then top bosses should be ousted from their jobs.
Fifty-seven per cent said the defence minister, now Peter MacKay, should be forced to resign, and 56% said the chief of defence staff, currently Walter Natynczyk, should go.
Question 6: If you send troops into a desert fight in green camo, should the Minister be responsible?
(Hint, it was the Liberals who did this)
Question 7: If officials knew back in 2001, when the troops where first sent over to Afghanistan that torture was the norm, should the Liberals be held to account?
(Hint, the press have a short memory and therefore they blame everything on the Conservatives, and ignore the FACT that it was the Liberals who had a bad transfer agreement and it was the Conservatives who fixed it).
This poll appears to be very biased, but I can't really tell because the results would cost me $95, and I'm not one of those rich Liberal bloggers who can afford to see the results.
This poll proves that lefties support Taliban Bombers, and think women killed for minor "crimes" do not matter. It is a sad statement of our lefty people, they used to support the down trodden, now they support terrorists. Is it fear?
Sunday, May 09, 2010
ADVOCACY = Money Sucking Special Interest Groups!
The lefties use words like "advocacy" to make it seem like they are actually helping people, too bad they are only words.
In other words, special interest groups who suck taxpayers money to do absolutely nothing for the people they are supposed to be helping.
There are those words: social justice again, add them to advocacy and you have lefties doing nothing but justifying it as "social justice". Kind of like these 11 organizations:
Read the whole article. This is from a magazine called Canadian Business. This article is so biased it is hard to believe a business magazine could print it and expect us to subscribe to their mag, or should I say rag?
I want you to look carefully at the organizations that are receiving funding cuts. Do you even recognize any of these organizations? Have any of you ever been helped by any of these organizations? Have any of you volunteered for any of these organizations? Can anyone explain why these organizations deserve taxpayers money?
Maybe we need to start digging into these organizations and find out what they do besides suck up taxpayers money. I know that I would not donate any of my hard earned money to any of these organizations, so why should they get my money through advocacy to the government?
How would lefties react if they found out the government was giving money to a group called "Canadians for the Preservation of Unborn Babies"? HA, thought so. Lefties can't stand "Real Women" even though they receive NO government money, but other "women's" organizations are more deserving because...... well, they just are. Never mind that they do nothing to actually help any women, except the directors of those bogus organizations.
Let the lefties yell about the lost funding for the Toronto Gay Parade. I have never been to one, and I have no idea why any government would fund any parade, for any reason. You want a parade, raise the funds yourselves. Just because you are gay, does not mean that you are anymore special and worthy of funding than any other group.
Advocacy = Social Justice. Basically as far as I can determine, it means get paid to protest anything you do not like.
By the way has anyone asked radical NDP MP Pat Martin what his assistant was doing at the Ann Coulter protest? The MSM is silent and dying.
I am sick and tired of my money going to groups that I fundamentally disagree with. It is not the job of the government to fund any group or charity. If you have a good charity, like "Kids for Cancer", people will donate money to you. If not, you have no right to suck off of taxpayers.
My Mother's Day Wish, is that all those radical women, who think killing babies in the womb is their right, and that the Taliban beheading women is not their problem, lose all their funding for all their radical organizations. You want to kill babies over in Africa, hold a fund raiser, call it "Killing Babies in Africa", I dare you to come out of the advocacy shadows and really show people what you are, and what you want to do, all in the name of "woman".
Advocacy by an individual or by an advocacy group normally aim to influence public-policy and resource allocation decisions within political, economic, and social systems and institutions; it may be motivated from moral, ethical or faith principles or simply to protect an asset of interest. Advocacy can include many activities that a person or organization undertakes including media campaigns, public speaking, commissioning and publishing research or poll or the 'filing of friend of the court briefs'. Lobbying (often by Lobby groups) is a form of advocacy where a direct approach is made to legislators on an issue which plays a significant role in modern politics.[1]
In other words, special interest groups who suck taxpayers money to do absolutely nothing for the people they are supposed to be helping.
There are several forms of advocacy, which each represent a different approach in the way change is brought into society. One of the most popular forms is social justice advocacy.
There are those words: social justice again, add them to advocacy and you have lefties doing nothing but justifying it as "social justice". Kind of like these 11 organizations:
In recent weeks, the following organizations have been denied funding by Status of Women Canada (SWC): the New Brunswick Coalition for Pay Equity, le Conseil d'intervention pour l'acc�s des femmes au travail (CIAFT), the Ontario Association of Interval and Transition Houses, Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women (CRIAW), R�seau des tables r�gionales de groupes de femmes du Qu�bec, the Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation, Action travail des femmes.
Several other key organizations have been denied SWC funding in the last few years, such as the Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women, Womenspace, the Child Care Advocacy Association of Canada, the Alberta Network of Immigration Women, Centre de documentation sur l'�ducation des adultes et la condition feminine, Association f�minine d'�ducation et d'action sociale (AFEAS.)
Read the whole article. This is from a magazine called Canadian Business. This article is so biased it is hard to believe a business magazine could print it and expect us to subscribe to their mag, or should I say rag?
I want you to look carefully at the organizations that are receiving funding cuts. Do you even recognize any of these organizations? Have any of you ever been helped by any of these organizations? Have any of you volunteered for any of these organizations? Can anyone explain why these organizations deserve taxpayers money?
Maybe we need to start digging into these organizations and find out what they do besides suck up taxpayers money. I know that I would not donate any of my hard earned money to any of these organizations, so why should they get my money through advocacy to the government?
How would lefties react if they found out the government was giving money to a group called "Canadians for the Preservation of Unborn Babies"? HA, thought so. Lefties can't stand "Real Women" even though they receive NO government money, but other "women's" organizations are more deserving because...... well, they just are. Never mind that they do nothing to actually help any women, except the directors of those bogus organizations.
Let the lefties yell about the lost funding for the Toronto Gay Parade. I have never been to one, and I have no idea why any government would fund any parade, for any reason. You want a parade, raise the funds yourselves. Just because you are gay, does not mean that you are anymore special and worthy of funding than any other group.
Advocacy = Social Justice. Basically as far as I can determine, it means get paid to protest anything you do not like.
By the way has anyone asked radical NDP MP Pat Martin what his assistant was doing at the Ann Coulter protest? The MSM is silent and dying.
I am sick and tired of my money going to groups that I fundamentally disagree with. It is not the job of the government to fund any group or charity. If you have a good charity, like "Kids for Cancer", people will donate money to you. If not, you have no right to suck off of taxpayers.
My Mother's Day Wish, is that all those radical women, who think killing babies in the womb is their right, and that the Taliban beheading women is not their problem, lose all their funding for all their radical organizations. You want to kill babies over in Africa, hold a fund raiser, call it "Killing Babies in Africa", I dare you to come out of the advocacy shadows and really show people what you are, and what you want to do, all in the name of "woman".
Friday, May 07, 2010
Friday Night Funnies: Butt Lift Gone Wrong!
A little known fact....
The first testicular guard, the "Cup",
was used in Hockey in 1874 and
the first helmet was used in 1974.
That means it only took 100 years for men to realize that their brain is also important.
Ladies.....Quit Laughing.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colonoscopy
All the organs of the body were having a meeting, trying to decide who was the one in charge.
"I should be in charge," said the brain , "Because I run all the body's systems, so without me nothing would happen."
"I should be in charge," said the blood , "Because I circulate oxygen all over so without me you'd all waste away."
"I should be in charge," said the stomach," Because I process food and give all of you energy."
"I should be in charge," said the legs , "because I carry the body wherever it needs to go."
"I should be in charge," said the eyes, "Because I allow the body to see where it goes."
"I should be in charge," said the rectum , "Because I'm responsible for waste removal."
All the other body parts laughed at the rectum And insulted him, so in a huff, he shut down tight.
Within a few days, the brain had a terrible headache, the stomach was bloated, the legs got wobbly, the eyes got watery, and the blood Was toxic. They all decided that the rectum should be the boss
.
The Moral of the story? Even though the others do all the work...
The ass hole is usually in charge.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken and his wife Edna went to the state fair every year,
And every year Ken would say,
'Edna, I'd like to ride in that helicopter'
Edna always replied,
'I know Ken, but that helicopter ride is fifty bucks,
And fifty bucks is fifty bucks'
One year Ken and Edna went to the fair,
and Ken said, 'Edna, I'm 75 years old.
If I don't ride that helicopter, I might never get another chance.'
To this, Edna replied,
"Ken that helicopter ride is fifty bucks, and fifty bucks is fifty bucks."
The pilot overheard the couple and said,
'Folks I'll make you a deal. I'll take the both of you for a ride. If you can stay quiet for the entire ride and don't say a word I won't charge you a penny! But if you say one word it's fifty dollars.'
Ken and Edna agreed and up they went.
The pilot did all kinds of fancy maneuvers, but not a word was heard.
He did his daredevil tricks over and over again,
But still not a word...
When they landed, the pilot turned to Ken and said,
'By golly, I did everything I could to get you to yell out, but you didn't.
I'm impressed!'
Ken replied,
'Well, to tell you the truth,
I almost said something when Edna fell out,
But you know,
"Fifty bucks is fifty bucks!'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Be careful when you get a butt lift.
They might lift it too much.
Here is a case of one butt lift that went wrong.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting Medical Study:
It has been studied and determined that the most often used sexual position
for married couples is the doggie position.
The husband
sits up
and
begs
and the
wife rolls over
and plays dead.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It has come to our attention that you may be reporting for duty while under the influence of alcohol. To clear the air, you are required to answer the question below.
Which direction is this car going..?
If you cannot tell, you drink too much!!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
T R A G E D Y
Little Johnny meets Barack Obama
Barack Obama was visiting a primary school and he visited one of the classes. They were in the middle of a discussion related to words and their meanings.
The teacher asked the president if he would like to lead the discussion on the word 'tragedy.' So our illustrious president asked the class for an example of a 'tragedy.'
One little boy stood up and offered: 'If my best friend, who lives on a farm, is playing in the field and a tractor runs over him and kills him, that would be a tragedy.'
'No,' said Obama, 'that would be an accident.'
A little girl raised her hand: 'If a school bus carrying 50 children drove over a cliff, killing everyone inside, that would be a tragedy.
I'm afraid not,' explained Obama. 'That's what we would call great loss'
The room went silent. No other children volunteered. Obama searched the room. 'Isn't there someone here who can give me an example of a tragedy?'
Finally at the back of the room, Little Johnny raised his hand. In a quiet voice he said: 'If the plane carrying you and Mrs. Obama was struck by a 'friendly fire' missile and blown to smithereens that would be a tragedy.'
'Fantastic!' exclaimed Obama. 'That's right. And can you tell me why that would be tragedy?'
'Well,' says the boy, 'It has to be a tragedy, because it certainly wouldn't be a great loss...and it probably wouldn't be an accident either.'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your cute animal video:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And your silly time wasting game for this week is: Mario Bros, one more plumber
One of my all time favorite DOS games, is Pickle Wars! You can download it here! It is a great game for young people as there is no real violence.
Have a great weekend, the snow has melted here, but it still feels more like winter than spring.
Thursday, May 06, 2010
Release Those Documents, Or Maybe Not.
We are at war. We have our brave troops fighting and dying in Afghanistan. Back at home, we have the opposition DEMANDING to know everything about our release of detainees to Afghan authorities. They are more interested in protecting Taliban terrorists, who by the way, are killing our troops, than supporting our troops.
They have no proof of torture, they have one diplomat, who never went outside the wire, thinking that ALL detainees were tortured, but no proof. Still they have DEMANDED all documents, because when you are on a witch hunt, you can't get anywhere without proof. So, the documents are going to be released to selected MP's from all parties, including the separatists. Should we trust them? Not likely.
First, we have Iggy calling a special Sunday press conference to tell the PM that he should keep the current GG. The PM asked the Queens secretary to ask the leaders of all parties for their opinions on who the next GG should be. The Liberals couldn't help make it a political issue. Are they university students or mature Members of Parliament who can keep secrets....secret?
Second, we see what will happen if the press actually gets their hands on those secret documents. From Alberta Ardvark's blog:
The Star,G&M, and Canwest forced to CHANGE reporters at Gitmo.
Read this link. Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name
Three of the four banned journalists are CANADIAN reporters! Talk about embarrassing Canada! They are so arrogant that they think the laws don't apply to them, because they are sure Omar is an innocent, little baby boy, who would never have done anything wrong, except for the fact that our troops were in Afghanistan. So, it's all our troops fault.
Do we seriously want any confidential documents to get into the hands of those journalists? Can we trust the Liberals, who love leaking documents to the media, to not leak any of those documents? We know the Liberals even let reporters write their questions for them, and now, we are to believe that for purely political reasons, they will not leak to the Liberal friendly press?
Release those documents, or maybe not! I would feel much safer if those documents were kept secret, at least until our troops are home, and safe.
They have no proof of torture, they have one diplomat, who never went outside the wire, thinking that ALL detainees were tortured, but no proof. Still they have DEMANDED all documents, because when you are on a witch hunt, you can't get anywhere without proof. So, the documents are going to be released to selected MP's from all parties, including the separatists. Should we trust them? Not likely.
First, we have Iggy calling a special Sunday press conference to tell the PM that he should keep the current GG. The PM asked the Queens secretary to ask the leaders of all parties for their opinions on who the next GG should be. The Liberals couldn't help make it a political issue. Are they university students or mature Members of Parliament who can keep secrets....secret?
Second, we see what will happen if the press actually gets their hands on those secret documents. From Alberta Ardvark's blog:
The Star,G&M, and Canwest forced to CHANGE reporters at Gitmo.
Read this link. Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name
GUANTANAMO BAY — Two weeks’ worth of proceedings in the pre-trial hearing of Omar Khadr found an unexpected meta-conclusion this afternoon as the public affairs shop in the Office of the Secretary of Defense banned four reporters from returning to Guantanamo Bay. Their offense: reporting the name of a witness whose identity is under a protective order.
The four journalists are Michelle Shephard of the Toronto Star, Steven Edwards of Canwest, Paul Koring of the Globe & Mail and Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald. They are not being thrown off the base, but, as of now, they are barred from returning.
Three of the four banned journalists are CANADIAN reporters! Talk about embarrassing Canada! They are so arrogant that they think the laws don't apply to them, because they are sure Omar is an innocent, little baby boy, who would never have done anything wrong, except for the fact that our troops were in Afghanistan. So, it's all our troops fault.
Do we seriously want any confidential documents to get into the hands of those journalists? Can we trust the Liberals, who love leaking documents to the media, to not leak any of those documents? We know the Liberals even let reporters write their questions for them, and now, we are to believe that for purely political reasons, they will not leak to the Liberal friendly press?
Release those documents, or maybe not! I would feel much safer if those documents were kept secret, at least until our troops are home, and safe.
Wednesday, May 05, 2010
Pro-Lifers Can't Lose!
Liberal appointed Senator Nancy Ruth advised a gathering of woman's groups to "shut the f--k up" on the abortion issue or risk a backlash from the government. The media has it wrong, she wasn't talking about a backlash from the government, but from Canadian citizens who do not want their tax dollars paying for abortions in other countries.
Senator Ruth is right, the lefties are too stupid to shut up about abortion. In Canada a woman can get an abortion paid for by taxpayers up until the baby takes it's first breath. No other country in the world allows that much latitude. What are feminists fighting? They get to kill their babies at any point in their pregnancy and get it paid for by us. The Conservative government is not willing to change that position, but as Senator Ruth told the feminists, shut up about it, because the only way it can go in Canada is for restrictions on abortions. They are too stupid to understand that, Canada has NO RESTRICTIONS right now, so the only way it can go is towards limited abortions. Feminists remind me of all the blond jokes. They don't know when they have a good thing going. Poor Senator Ruth tried to tell them but even she has to admit defeat.
Pro-lifers can't lose! If the feminists keep this up, Canadians are going to demand some limits to abortions, it's the only way the issue can go. It can't get more liberal unless feminists are going to support killing new born breathing babies, but even they can't be so cruel.
If the feminists aren't whining about needing more abortions world wide, they are yapping about their funding cuts by the mean old Conservative government.
Match International got $400,000 cut just weeks ago. So what do they do? You tell me because:
1. They do not publish their financial statements
2. They do not list any Canadian projects
3. They advocate, but do not provide any actual results
They don't appear to be helping anyone except maybe themselves. Show me the results. Show me a program in Canada that helps aboriginal women. Show me something for my $400,000. They appear to be government bloodsuckers:
So, $50 bucks to Match equals $200. Nice gig if you can get it.
Then we get an ultra lefty crying about all those rape victims.
Safe Motherhood? I love that idea, where do I sign up! Actually, if you go to their site, no mention of abortion is made anywhere, so why is McTeer denigrating her own organization? Why is killing African babies so important to McTeer? The White Ribbon organization actually has annual reports, not like Match, maybe that's why Match lost it's funding.
I'm not sure that White Ribbon should be happy with McTeer. She has done more harm than good to their cause.
For heavens sake, quit with the rape gig. I understand that rape is a horrible crime, and if lefties would only support the tough on crime bills, we might get some of those sickos behind bars. If a woman is raped, the chances that she will get pregnant are pretty slim, but it is used as a big hammer to support their position.
Would eco-environment let a mouse out of their cage.
Senator Ruth is right, the lefties are too stupid to shut up about abortion. In Canada a woman can get an abortion paid for by taxpayers up until the baby takes it's first breath. No other country in the world allows that much latitude. What are feminists fighting? They get to kill their babies at any point in their pregnancy and get it paid for by us. The Conservative government is not willing to change that position, but as Senator Ruth told the feminists, shut up about it, because the only way it can go in Canada is for restrictions on abortions. They are too stupid to understand that, Canada has NO RESTRICTIONS right now, so the only way it can go is towards limited abortions. Feminists remind me of all the blond jokes. They don't know when they have a good thing going. Poor Senator Ruth tried to tell them but even she has to admit defeat.
Pro-lifers can't lose! If the feminists keep this up, Canadians are going to demand some limits to abortions, it's the only way the issue can go. It can't get more liberal unless feminists are going to support killing new born breathing babies, but even they can't be so cruel.
If the feminists aren't whining about needing more abortions world wide, they are yapping about their funding cuts by the mean old Conservative government.
Match International got $400,000 cut just weeks ago. So what do they do? You tell me because:
1. They do not publish their financial statements
2. They do not list any Canadian projects
3. They advocate, but do not provide any actual results
Placement Student Opportunities
In collaboration with the University of Ottawa, Carleton University and Algonquin College, MATCH provides placement opportunities for students in the following areas of study: women’s studies, social work, international development, international relations, political science, fundraising and marketing, sociology, international law, public policy and public health. Students considering a placement at MATCH should contact the Centre.
They don't appear to be helping anyone except maybe themselves. Show me the results. Show me a program in Canada that helps aboriginal women. Show me something for my $400,000. They appear to be government bloodsuckers:
So, $50 bucks to Match equals $200. Nice gig if you can get it.
Then we get an ultra lefty crying about all those rape victims.
McTeer, who works with the White Ribbon Alliance for Safe Motherhood, said she was at first "delighted" to hear that Prime Minister Stephen Harper planned to make reducing maternal and childhood morbidity and mortality in the developing world a key initiative when he hosts next month's G8 and G20 summits in Ontario.
However, the federal government's plan to exclude abortion from its funding for the initiative means women who live in conflict zones where rape is a tool of war, or young girls who are married off to older men and find themselves pregnant at age 10 or 11, will be left to their own devices when trying to access a safe abortion, McTeer said.
Safe Motherhood? I love that idea, where do I sign up! Actually, if you go to their site, no mention of abortion is made anywhere, so why is McTeer denigrating her own organization? Why is killing African babies so important to McTeer? The White Ribbon organization actually has annual reports, not like Match, maybe that's why Match lost it's funding.
I'm not sure that White Ribbon should be happy with McTeer. She has done more harm than good to their cause.
For heavens sake, quit with the rape gig. I understand that rape is a horrible crime, and if lefties would only support the tough on crime bills, we might get some of those sickos behind bars. If a woman is raped, the chances that she will get pregnant are pretty slim, but it is used as a big hammer to support their position.
Would eco-environment let a mouse out of their cage.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)