Bill C-484, the Unborn Victims of Crime Act had some help in passing into committee, Liberals 27, NDP 1, Bloq 0, Ind 1, Conservatives 120. Not one of those Liberals, NDP or Independents were female, NOT ONE!
ALL Liberal, Bloq and NDP Females voted AGAINST, and one Conservative female. SHAME! They cry about having more women as MP's, well if this is what we get, no thanks.
These hardline feminists disgust me. Have they never had children of their own, never felt their baby kicking them late at night, never worried about the baby they were carrying, never had an ultrasound, never felt the pure joy of bringing a new little being to life? They have turned their backs on women who honour motherhood to support those that would kill their own babies. They are scared, shrill, and like to inform us that the debate is over. I pity their kids, if they have any.
If they were pregnant and attacked by some thug, and he stabbed and killed the baby they choose to carry, would they not mourn for that baby? Would they not want that little life to be acknowledged as a victim of crime? Are they so insecure in their own womenhood that they can not support women who have suffered horrible crimes against them and their babies? Are they so intent on killing babies that they can only see abortion as the issue? Why are they threathened by a bill that supports Mothers to be, and their choices? I thought it was my body, my choice? Where is the women's choice, when a man attacks her, and kills the baby she wanted.
How can all those female MP's justify voting against women who have suffered the worse crime they could ever suffer, having their baby killed, when they had made the choice to keep, nuture and love that baby. This is not about the sacred abortion cow, as clearly stated in the bill.
Termination of pregnancy and acts in good faith excluded
(7) For greater certainty, this section does not apply in respect of
(a) conduct relating to the lawful termination of the pregnancy of the mother of the child to which the mother has consented;
(b) an act or omission that a person acting in good faith considers necessary to preserve the life of the mother of the child or the life of the child; or
(c) any act or omission by the mother of the child.
This is about insecure feminists, who think they are the only ones who are right, and that choice is only allowed to women who choose abortion. Don't give me any of that going back to the days of coat hangers garbage, either, truely independent women have progressed beyond the 60's, it's time for the feminists to get a new message, the one they have isn't working anymore, and they know it.
Sisters? Not likely, when you only support some women, and not others, when you try to close down discussion on this bill because you FEAR it might lead to a restriction of abortion. Seeing as we have NO abortion law, and women can kill their babies even at 40 weeks, what are you scared of? SHAME on those female MP's who refuse to support ALL women, and their choices! You are not my Sister, you are not promoting equality, you are stiffling it.
9 comments:
There is a progressive site where they are talking about how the MP's failed all women. They didn't fail all women - they didn't fail the significant number of women who are pro-life, they didn't fail unborn women, and they didn't fail the people out there who take a middle ground on the issue. They also didn't fail those that are convinced that there is the ability to separate this criminal matter from abortion itself.
Feminists need to learn to speak for themselves and not for half the world.
Thank you for posting about this HOV
You are welcome MissHailey, it comes from my heart, so some posts are easier to write than others.
What you say is true, feminists need to stop telling all women that they speak for them, they don't, not by a long shot.
Imagine a male posting such as I just did, they would be crucified.
Great post, Hunter!
I heard a Bloc MP (female) yesterday saying the Bloc would do everything in their power to stop this bill from going through. Imagine!
Common decency gets trumped by the Feminazi agenda every time.
Which Tory voted against the bill?
Josee Verner
You've got your numbers wrong. Two Tory females (and two Tory males) voted against the bill: Verner, Boucher, O'Connor, and Cannon.
One Liberal woman voted for the bill, Albina Guarnieri.
And if almost all women MP's voted against the bill, it should make you stop and think for a moment about their real reasons, and wonder if maybe, just maybe, they're .... right?
I've been seeing this "argument" everywhere, about how pro-choicers don't care about pregnant women who want to have their babies. Since obviously everyone cares about that (pro-choicers just support other, better measures to protect them, not this Trojan Horse bill), such "arguments" are clearly asinine, ignorant, and hateful. I trust most Canadians can recognize them for what they are - the ravings of a lunatic fringe.
Skdadl's information is right in terms of the voting choices of the MP's.
In terms of the anonymous post Hunter it's not my business but why do you allow anonymous posts? And the idea that pro-choice women do not care about this situation because the woman was carrying her pregnancy to term that has merit. Ask any pro choice woman over 30 who Chantal Daigle is and they all know. They bring her up at length. She is a woman that faced a violent spouse who wanted her to have the baby and she chose abortion in the face of legal and personal pressure. She was - and is - to them a hero. She is highly memorable to them. A woman on a progressive pro-choice site that is devoting ample resources to the whole debate over this bill actually asked who Olivia was in response to Suzanne's suggestion of re-naming it "Olivia's law".They actually asked "WHO IS OLIVIA?". I assure you if Chantal Daigle had been harmed by her boyfriend in the process of executing her plans to ahve an abortion she would have been memorialized for all time but Olivia Talbot was carrying her pregnancy to term so the response is "Who is she?" What's that name?' "Huh?".
Mary Talbot (aka Marylou) has written a public letter about how she feels she's been treated. It's tragic - just tragic - that her grief is not recognized.
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/opinion/story.html?id=7f51beb2-7e3c-4e04-b6c3-df6363ca0f0f
Post a Comment