What are the feminists afraid of, why are they so shrill about a bill that protects the unborn? Yes, I know they think abortion is threatened. Maybe it should be. Why can a woman legally kill her baby at any stage of her pregnancy, included up to 40 weeks?
Listen to this Bloq MP, she is willing to FORCE MP's to vote against this bill, she does not want a free vote, she wants a dictatorship. She DEMANDS that all MP's vote against the bill. She can barely spit out the word abortion, she never calls the baby a baby, it's some sort of alien blob that has invaded a woman's body, she will never admit that it is a human baby that gets killed. Wonder what her stance is on the seal hunt.
I think Demers was/is fighting some sort of cancer, but I'm not sure because her blog is only in French, so much for bi-lingualism. If she is, she should be the first person to champion baby rights. She is fighting hard to live, but she doesn't think babies in the womb should have those same rights. Shame on her.
The lefties cry about seals being killed, and then they turn around and demand that women have the right to kill their own babies. Guess if their abortions were carried out on the snow so we could see the blood and baby parts they might change their minds. Think the club used on seals is brutal? How about dismemberment, salt poisoning, or my favorite, scissors to the brain.
A perfect example of how sick they are, how disrespectful of even the concept of babies needing protection, is this little fraud.
A Yale student's stunning claims of repeatedly artificially inseminating herself and then taking drugs to induce miscarriages for her senior art project aren't true, the university said Thursday night.
The student, art major Aliza Shvarts, told several high-level Yale officials that she did not do the things she said she did in constructing the exhibit, according to a strongly worded statement issued by the Ivy League school and sent to FOXNews.com.
"The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman’s body," said Helaine S. Klasky, associate dean and vice president for public affairs at Yale. "Ms. Shvarts is engaged in performance art. Her art project includes visual representations, a press release and other narrative materials."
Real or not, this student is seriously mental, and for Yale to call this "art" in any way, shape, or form is just sick. An art piece? ART? Proof that lefties are out of control more like it.
The question is, why are feminists so scared of a bill that will protect a wanted baby if harmed or killed?
Personally, I think they know they are losing the fight, they know people are cringing at the thought of baby killing. They can yell "woman's right to choose" all they want, but young girls are not as stupid as the feminists think they are, and they are choosing life, over death. Just like Demers made that same choice for herself.
I was very tempted to show a picture of a seal being clubbed to death and an aborted baby all dismembered, but I couldn't do it.
24 comments:
A fetus is not a baby. It is a collection of developing cells that can not breathe.
Who are you to tell a woman what she should do with her own body? Shake off your fear and control fantasies, and let people live their lives with respect. Try to figure out that not everyone wants to hear from you. Try to figure out that humans could live in peace and harmony if the humans like yourselves would, if you could, understand that you have no business telling others what they should do. Go live your life, and respect other people, and give up on the spreading hate part. It's ugly, useless, demeaning, counter-productive and kinda troll-like.
Join the human race, and things will look a little rosier to you.
"Feminist's"? That is the possessive for a "feminist" — please learn how to write proper English.
238.1 (1) Every person who, directly or indirectly, causes the death of a child during birth or at any stage of development before birth while committing or attempting to commit an offence against the mother of the child, who the person knows or ought to know is pregnant
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of 10 years if the person
(i) means to cause the child’s death, or
(ii) means to cause injury to the child or mother that the person knows is likely to cause the child’s death, and is reckless as to whether death ensues or not;
(b) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life if paragraph (a) does not apply but the person shows wanton or reckless disregard for the life or safety of the child;
The bill seems clear to me. There is no mention of abortion or a woman's right to choose. It is meant for thugs who physically attack pregnant women, causing them to lose their fetus.
I think you make a big mistake when you attempt to position this issue as a left versus right thing. If you think that a vote for the CPC
automatically means support for anti-abortion legislation, you're sadly mistaken.
"Shake off your fear and control fantasies, and let people live their lives with respect. Try to figure out that not everyone wants to hear from you. "
Um consareidiots - back at ya.
Ha - I see the old professor is here correcting grammar.
I've always found it funny (odd not haha) how people who are against capital punishment are usually in favour of abortion. And how people who are in favour of capital punishment are against abortion.
How about a more fundamental question: Why is the fetus even considered "her body"? I know, the fetus is inside and nourished by the mother, etc..but consider this - she did not spontaneously generate this fetus by herself, it only has half the hosts DNA. Very strange we can't legally kill a prematurely born baby before the end of nine months. And for the trolls, no I'm not a so-con, I don't even go to church.
Kriilin Namek
Having been present at many, many births of both animals and humans I can honestly say that any maroon who says, "A fetus is not a baby. It is a collection of developing cells that can not breathe." is too stupid to have an opinion worth considering. I might suggest that such a person should be slapped with their own crap and be sent to spend ten years working in a farrowing barn.
Why are gays(red tory) and feminists/lesbians(demers) so strange?
It's interesting that it is the feminists who are bringing up abortion when, as Tony points out, it's about violence towards an unborn baby.
What are they scared of?
"woman's right to choose"
I firmly believe in this right. To chose to abort
or chose to give birth
is a women's right.
Both rights should be up held and can not be severed.
Women should support other women, regardless of the choice she makes.
The BIGGEST problem is that there is no abortion laws in Canada.
So abortion is not illegal in Canada,
but a law would define abortion as legal.
IMO, as soon as a fetus can live outside a women's womb, we have a baby.
I think (?) it has been determined to be 22 or 24 weeks.
I know there would be many good arguments with a defined 'life begans at 22 weeks',
the murder of a Mom carrying a 21 week, or less, fetus would not be a double murder,
and an abortion 23+ weeks would have to meet specific criteria, or be deemed criminal.
But it's better than what we have now, which is nothing.
What are they scared of?
I think the better question is what are you scared of?Woman can terminate unwanted pregnancies in this country. That's the way it is. Of course, if you do not wish to exercise this right, you needn't.
I would absolutely love the CPC to campaign with this issue. We would be free of social conservative interference for a generation.
Becareful what you wish for anon.
Lizzy May is prolife,
and Dion is noted as pro-life also,
on a religious site that collects voting data.
Came across the site when I was searching how Libs voted on keeping the definition of marriage as one man one women.
Dion voted Yes on that one too.
Will find the site and link.
o/t
Once again, anon has shown why there should be no anonymous comments.
IMO, commentors should have to show the blog owner their e-mail address, even tho some Libloggers will answer you using your first name, (like it matters hahah).
Would sure cut down on the stupidity.
that was meant for anon at 8.05
Wilson, I have no problem with a law that would limit when an abortion can be performed, frankly, I'd love to see any law in that direction.
Anon 1:00, I'm not scared of anything, and I am not demanding that ALL abortions be made illegal. What I object to is feminists like Demers, DEMANDING that abortion be kept legal up to the time of birth. That is disgusting.
They are so scared of their position, that they can't support a bill that is clearly aimed at protecting the WANTED unborn from harm. Demers wants to stifle debate, why?
She is doing everything to save her own life, but the life of a baby doesn't count in her world.
Hey anon, do you support the seal hunt? You better, because if you agree with abortion, any killing of any animal should also be okay, at any time of their life, so white coat baby seals should be fair game. Right??.
''Wilson, I have no problem with a law that would limit when an abortion can be performed, frankly, I'd love to see any law in that direction''
Which means that you support the legalization of abortion.
Just say it!
Let the parameters be set by physicians.
Right now, abortion is not illegal,
but it is not legal either.
That is why the pro-abortionists fear this unborn child law.
So get a law and lay to rest your fears.
Abortions could be legal right up to the 40th week, even with a 'life begins at 22 weeks' law.
That's why we pay parliamentarians the big bucks, to figure out the details.
Any mental health reasons for an abortion would be dealt with long before the 5th month of pregnancy.
Which would leave the lone reason of physical harm to the mother, post 22 weeks.
The unborn child law would have to include where abortion is necessary to save the mother's life, which would legalize abortion, thru the back door.
This debate can not be about
'baby killers' vs. 'breeders'.
No Wilson, I do not support the legalization of abortion, and I never will. But that is what we have right now, abortion on demand, up to and including 40 week old babies. I am realistic, let's move the bar slowly, let's get a limit on when abortion can be done. If we take an all or nothing stance, we will end up with more dead babies.
'let's get a limit on when abortion can be done'
But Hunter, that is legalizing abortion, which I support, tho I haven't always supported it.
Limits would have to be legislated, thereby making abortions legal.
Abortions are being done now,
it is not against the law (because there isn't a law).
Let the medical experts say when a fetus could survive on it's own, any time after that date, and a panel of doctors could advise.
Then there is no longer an issue to fearmonger.
I don't know what the statistics are, but I doubt that very few abortions take place after 24 weeks (6 months).
And I would guess that late term abortions are performed when the mothers physical health/life is endangered.
I just can't believe that a woman, a month or two before delivery would go to the doctor and say 'I've changed my mind, get rid of it'.
I just don't believe that about another women.
Wilson when you wrote "Let the medical experts say when a fetus could survive on it's own" I hope you were aware that the baby, from the moment the sperm and egg meet, is living on its own in its own environment just as any creature lives on its own in its own environment. Change the environment and the creature dies.
You survive on your own so long as you have air to breath, immerses you in water for extended period of time or put you into a vacuum and you will die. A pre term baby in uterus is "living on its own" in its own environment. Remove the envirionment and the baby will die just as will any living creature removed from its environment.
As a Christian I believe you have a Divine Right to exist until such time as He who gave you Life takes you home. Just as you have that Right so too does every other human being, born or unborn.
From your comments Wilson your strange as well.
Wilson, you can talk legal or illegal, that's not the point. The point is, can we please stop killing babies, at any stage in their lives. It's not political, it's a moral issue.
Because the "progressives" have been in power for so long, we can't even bring in a bill to charge someone who deliberately stabs the baby in a Mothers womb, and kills it. Should that person get off scott free if the Mother lives? If they kill both, shouldn't both be recognized?
It's not about abortion, it's about justice.
If you want abortions illegal, why don't you move to someplace that is more in line with your views.... like Iran.
I'm very sorry I stumbled on this blog as it is simply a mess of twisted logic, misplaced priorities, and really stupid insulting comments. So in the sheer lunacy of the debate here let me pose a question. When a man masturbates and then cleans up with a tissue, is he guilty of causing violence to the unborn? After all, ever sperm is a little living thing that can grow into a real live baby. And born into the wrong circumstance could grow into a bitter, twisted troll like creature that doesn't understand logic and perhaps kills baby seals for enjoyment.
There - have fun with that.
Post a Comment