Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Salute to a Brave and Modest Nation

This is from 2003, but it is still relevant today:

Salute to a brave and modest nation

Kevin Myers
The Sunday Telegraph

As our country honours the last of its four dead soldiers, we reprint a remarkable tribute to Canada's record of quiet valour in wartime that appeared in the Telegraph, one of Britain's largest circulation newspapers.

- - -

LONDON - Until the deaths last week of four Canadian soldiers accidentally killed by a U.S. warplane in Afghanistan, probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops were deployed in the region. And as always, Canada will now bury its dead, just as the rest of the world as always will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything Canada ever does.

It seems that Canada's historic mission is to come to the selfless aid both of its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored. Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries. But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again.

That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States, and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts. For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions: It seemed to be a part of the old world, yet had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it deserved.

Yet its purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom in two world wars was perhaps the greatest of any democracy. Almost 10% of Canada's entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle.

Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by downright neglect, its unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular memory as somehow or other the work of the "British." The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against U-boat attack.

More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone. Canada finished the war with the third-largest navy and the fourth-largest air force in the world.

The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had the previous time. Canadian participation in the war was acknowledged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a campaign in which the United States had clearly not participated -- a touching scrupulousness which, of course, Hollywood has since abandoned, as it has any notion of a separate Canadian identity.

So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality -- unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg and Dan Aykroyd have in the popular perception become American, and Christopher Plummer, British. It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers.

Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of its sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves -- and are unheard by anyone else -- that 1% of the world's population has provided 10% of the world's peacekeeping forces. Canadian soldiers in the past half century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth -- in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties, from Vietnam to East Timor, from Sinai to Bosnia.

Yet the only foreign engagement that has entered the popular non-Canadian imagination was the sorry affair in Somalia, in which out-of-control paratroopers murdered two Somali infiltrators. Their regiment was then disbanded in disgrace -- a uniquely Canadian act of self-abasement for which, naturally, the Canadians received no international credit.

So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbour has given it in Afghanistan?

Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac, Canada repeatedly does honourable things for honourable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun.

It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honour comes at a high cost.

This week, four more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too tragically well.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

"This is from 2003, but it is still relevant today: "

April 26, 2002.

Anonymous said...

Your link is from http://beatles.ncf.ca ? How peculiar and amusing...

Anonymous said...

So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality -- unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, "William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg and Dan Aykroyd have in the popular perception become American, and Christopher Plummer, British. It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers."

What a retard.

hunter said...

Come on LS, explain to me why I shouldn't delete this guys comments. Explain to me how his comments are adding to the debate.

Give it a try LS. Tell me how on Remembrance Day, he is respecting our troops with his comments.

Anonymous said...

Should be one of these, " up at the top of that last comment in front of So...


Great job today Huntsy you managed to
break faith with Canada's military and its artists in two moves only. Well, I guess you're only pretty good at checkers. HA!

Anonymous said...

Let me ask you "Hunter" what does the paragraph I pulled out of Mr Myers' article have to do with Remembrance Day?

Anonymous said...

And also where do you click on "beatlesncf.ca" to come up with the link to Salute to a Brave and Modest Nation? It sure is incongruous with the rest of the beatles fan stuff and trivia they host there.

hunter said...

Still waiting Liberal Supporter, you make the call, delete or not?

Bec said...

mysty,

Your comments and sarcastic ridicule are inappropriate and hopelessly argumentative.

Provide, if you are able,some balance with your rants or do us all a favor and leave.

What is with you guys anyway and your chronic and childish bashing at this site?
Do you despise females?

Southern Quebec said...

Nice try Bec. What we despise is intellectually dishonesty. That's it...nothing more.

Stop trying to wrap yourself in the flag..."Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"

"Explain to me how his comments are adding to the debate." When you explain why a commercial from the world's largest blood sucking corporation makes you feel, just, so Canadian.

(You must be a civil servant if you are not working today!)

Bec said...

" When you explain why a commercial from the world's largest blood sucking corporation makes you feel, just, so Canadian."

Well you know SQ, that same "blood sucking corporation" had a huge poignant memorial for Sapper Steven Marshall set up here in his hometown.
Folks were stopping, saluting, donating to the fund and generally showing open and respectful grief.

I was very impressed and expect to see the same honor shown to soldier, Samuel John Bassett this week.

Wal-Mart, is also a Canadian employer that cares, volunteers and donates to the local landscape so excuse me if I call your BS just that, BS.

As far as the civil servant comment goes, it is my understanding that the only provinces that do not recognize November 11 as a stat are Ontario and Quebec.

We are all off out here and attended various memorials to honor our Canadian military.

liberal supporter said...

Still waiting Liberal Supporter, you make the call, delete or not?
Sorry, I was busy making up the time I was out this morning.

In general, I would not delete unless they swear, since that is your main rule. Endless carping on the same point could qualify, if it is just duplicating an earlier comment.

Explain to me how his comments are adding to the debate.

Give it a try LS. Tell me how on Remembrance Day, he is respecting our troops with his comments
.
I see no disrespect of the troops at all, today or any other day from this person.

As for adding to the debate, that is subjective, so I will look at each one:

2:01:00 PM: Nitpicking about the year, but not untrue.

2:12:00 PM: wondering about the URL. Nitpicking as well. Not a gem, but not disrespecting troops, or even you.

2:19:00 PM: "what a retard" is disagreeing with the premise that Canadian entertainers are not known as Canadians. Actually they are in general. You could find the stereotypical stupid American who only thinks someone is foreign if they have an accent (hence Christopher Plummer being taken as English). The Celine Dion is standard mocking of her, though out of date, since in 2002 she was taken by Caesars Las Vegas and paid $100 million over 3 years.
Not disrespecting the troops or you, disagreeing with a theme that was told more humourously in "the Canadian conspiracy".

2:23:00 PM mocking you, but still not disrespecting the troops.

2:32:00 PM nit picking. The article was not about Remembrance Day itself in the first place, though it does allude to our contributions being forgotten in the tidal wave of American (and others') flag waving. The actors stuff was trying to support that view in the article.

3:23:00 PM a question on where you found the article, though in the context of earlier comments it comes across as nit picking.

mystereeso's comments remind me of "kevron" in general style though not the same. One liners that are sometimes irrelevant, sometimes don't make sense, sometimes interesting, and sometimes absolutely hilarious.

As I said earlier, youtube doesn't work for me here, so though I saw the mention of a walmart commercial, I didn't see it so I am not reacting as mysteresso and SQ are.

Leaving them up allowed Bec to criticize and I think make a reasonable demand for something more serious in addition. Things are often self balancing in that way.

hunter said...

Interesting LS, you used your head and actually made some sense. Now if you would only do that on your own blog, grown ups might visit.

Bec, one lefty blogger who I will not name seems to have something against females, particularly Conservative female bloggers. His little followers come by on his command and disrupt our blogs. Have you noticed how few female Conservative bloggers allow comments, or have comment moderation on? It's kind of like stalking, but in the cyberworld.

Anonymous said...

"Provide, if you are able,some balance with your rants or do us all a favor and leave."

In fact I offered an apology to Huntsy which she has not acknowledged. That does tend to render my mood somewhat nit picky.

You see, I believe the piece was actually published in the Telegraph on April 21, 2002 under a different title - it wasn't called called Salute to a Brave and Modest Nation as shown in the Post via beatles.ncf.ca but rather it was called The country the world forgot - again which I kinda think puts a whole 'nuther spin on things.

Sort of like leaving out Arkansas or wherever the heck it was in the previous post.

Anonymous said...

And I'm still so curious. How do you get to here from here - not out of "sarcastic ridicule or inappropriate and hopeless argument" but I am genuinely curious. What button do I click to get from the one to the other?

Anonymous said...

I mean, that is a communist flag up there in the corner - no? I thought you had no patience for lefties today Huntsy!

hunter said...

Poor My, you are obviously a very lonely individual. Try to get out of the basement and actually talk to some real people.

Anonymous said...

So - you're not a real person then...

Anonymous said...

That explains your inability to differentiate between a commercial advert and a memorial tribute. That explains your inability to acknowledge when an apology has been offered. That explains your need to belittle the genuine remarks of others with condescending and snide ad hominems.

You just can't be a real person Huntsy.