Holocaust survivors cooking a meal. I totally disagree with giving a killer the Order of Canada. You can dress it up anyway you want to, but abortion is killing.
So we have a holocaust survivor, who turns around and kills babies. Is this deserving of the Order of Canada? I notice other bloggers are trying to take the high road by stating that women would be having "coat hanger" abortions if not for Morgentaler, that women now have the freedom to choose. I call BULLSHIT!!
Morgentaler is a disgusting, immoral excuse for a human being. He hides behind his holocaust experience to perpetrate a mini-holocaust of his own. He does not give women power to choose, he takes away their right to become Mother's, and love their children. He is a slimy, money hungry Bas&^rd, who preys on women at their weakest time. He turns this:
Into this:
Come on you pro-Morgentaler bloggers show the real truth, show the eight month old dead babies, and explain how that is a women's right to choose. Explain to me how 20 weeks is okay to abort, but 21 weeks isn't (even though Canada allows abortions up to 40 weeks). Who gives Morgentaler the power to decide what is a baby and what isn't. Google late term abortions and see what you find. Have women never heard of the pill, condoms, and the morning after pill??? Why do 100,000 babies still need to be aborted in our enlightened society? Are women just that stupid? We want equality but can't seem to keep our legs crossed, or take a little pill to prevent pregnancy.
The Governor General is a disgrace to our country by appointing Morgentaler to the Order of Canada. I hope Wayne Gretzky, and others, return their medals in protest.
74 comments:
Great post, but it seems that people like Raphael Alexander think that Morgentaler deserves the award.
You know, left wing moonbats think that they're the party of human rights.
Yet they have no trouble accepting the fact that 8 month old fetuses can be chopped up, and have their brains sucked out by a vacuum.
This country of Canada is nothing more than a ragtag bunch of activist groups.
No morals, no decency, no nothing.
It seems the majority of the people are actually the minority now.
Canada is a disgrace and you really have to wonder why people allow our politicians to wreak havoc on us. I think its high time for the people to overthrow the government and install a more civilized republic.
I hate this country more than I hate the taliban.
Disgraceful.
I forgot to mention that Michelle Jean is a foreigner and also a disgrace to our country.
I still can't figure out why a native born Canadian could not have become G.G.
Send that stupid bitch back to Haiti or wherever she came from.
Don't you just love what Liberals are doing to this country. They want votes and will do anything to get them including selling out the majority.
It's funny how Canada has aborted over 3 million people in the last 30 years and at the same time imported 5 million immigrants, mostly from the middle east and asia.
So, lets keep killing native Canadians all the while importing muslims and asians.
This country deserves to be nuked.
The sooner the better.
Right now abortion is not legal, there are no laws on the books. But because of this, abortion is not illegal either.
The panel was split on this decision, not the usual consensus.
The Liberals get the abortion topic on the public agenda, thru the back door.
Anyone who can remember being a fetus, please say so.
Legal life begins at birth.
That's a lovely comment you've allowed from "johnathon", Hunter. Thank God he didn't swear 'cause I know you have serious issues with foul language.
But KKK-style racism? Not so much ...
"This country deserves to be nuked."
Exactly. We allow abortion, so we should be nuked.
I love conservatives.
Johnathon, you should be ashamed for your comments, which quite frankly espouse a form of bigotry I had thought long extinct. As for the comments by anon at 7:57: Raise your hands if you remember being a 6 month old. Most wouldn't; does this mean life begins when memories become permanent? It is indeed quite a ridiculous qualifier for the beginning of life.
As for me and my honours degree in biochemical sciences; I will maintain that a new life with an entirely unique genetic code begins at conception. Should you feel up to debating me o the science of that, I will make myself available.
I hate this country more than I hate the taliban.
Why do conservatives hate Canada?
Wilson, is it legal to throw a frisbee while wearing a pony tail? Or are there no laws on the books to cover that?
Just a couple more quick questions - Hunter, that fetus that you show in your post, the one wearing a blue sleeper - at what stage of gestation is that photo taken?
Did that one get killed?
Thx -
Crabby
ps - Johnathon, have you considered moving to a country where you might be happy? Does such a place exist?
Johnathon, in my opinion, speaks for the right-to-life movement. He's just more open and honest about it. Not to mention a psychopath, enabled by Hunter, who doesn't have the balls to say that kind of stuff himself.
But he wants to. Can't you feel him want to?
What I said about Canada killing 3 million babies and then importing 5 million mulims and asians is 100 true.
What is so hard about hearing the truth?
If you dont like the truth , just say so.
Hunter is doing nothing wrong about allowing people put facts on the table.
KKK?
Grow up idiots.
How many of those 3 million "babies" were Muslim or Asian, Johnathon? Is it okay not to get upset about them?
I think poor johnathon doesn't understand the difference between a baby and a fetus.
Also, I don't see anything wrong with importing Muslims and asians. Me being half of one and both of the other (technically).
Dr. Dawg shows his ignorance by not even taking the time to read my post, if he/she had, they would have figured out that Hunter is a she, not a he! But that's the level of intelligence Canadian cynic readers display.
Hey Canadian cynic, why don't you write your own posts about issues? You to stupid to hold an opinion of your own?
Wow hunter, what a balanced and nuanced response to the criticisms you received.
And they call conservatives mindless reactionaries! Pshaw!
Poor, poor Hunter ... so terribly offended to be mistaken for a man by the good Doctor but so obviously okay with Johnathon's filth. After all, he didn't swear.
Actually Paladiea, no one has bothered to comment on my post. Do you like the picture of the cut up baby? You lefties try to change the tune, and ignore the real issue, baby killing.
If you don't like my blog, stop reading it! But like a good little Dawg follower, you run around after him/her praising all things Dawg. Grow up. Learn to attack the issues, not the people stating opinions.
Dawg wants me to remove a comment because he/she doesn't agree with their point of view, too bad we still have freedom of speech in this country right?
Raise your hands if you remember being a 6 month old. Most wouldn't; does this mean life begins when memories become permanent?
Of course it doesn't. You are trying to assert that the debate hinges on when "life" begins. Life "begins" before conception, both egg and sperm are not dead material, therefore they are alive.
For legal purposes, life begins at birth.
It is indeed quite a ridiculous qualifier for the beginning of life.
It is the qualifier that allows us to kill animals for food. It is how we differentiate humans from animals.
As for me and my honours degree in biochemical sciences;
Funny nobody is trying to claim your "science" is all just a bunch of opinions. Is it only climate scientists who are crooks, solely interested in making money off the climate change? Just wondering.
I will maintain that a new life with an entirely unique genetic code begins at conception. Should you feel up to debating me o the science of that, I will make myself available.
Must be tiring, lugging all those goalposts around. Nobody debates that eggs, sperm and embryos are all alive. Plus embryos contain dna that combines the egg and sperm's dna.
But providing legal recognition as separate individuals to these things serves no legal purpose. The things thus protected have no memory or understanding, so there is no perceivable benefit to them.
Since nobody who has been born will ever be in a situation of being unborn and at risk of being aborted, legal recognition of these things does not give assurance of your own safety to anyone who has been born. That is unlike the situation where we continue to legally recognize disabled people, even those who are unaware of their surroundings, since it could happen to anyone.
Shorter Hunter: Look! A dead baby! That totally lets me get away with leaving up Johnathon's racist hatemongering ...
Actually Hunter, someone DID comment on your post, but you deleted it rather than responding. My criticism stands.
Do you like the picture of the cut up baby?
I don't see a picture of a cut up baby. I see a picture of a baby, and some limbs of a fetus.
If you don't like my blog, stop reading it! But like a good little Dawg follower, you run around after him/her praising all things Dawg.
If you don't like criticism why have a comments section?
By the way, I never even mentioned Dawg. Perhaps you should address the party responsible?
And I never mentioned removing the post.
You just like making stuff up, don't you, Hunter?
By "post," incidentally, I was referring to the comment in question.
Btw, Hunter, I don't give a damn what sex you are. Just so you know.
Details, details ... don’t bother Hunter with details, Doc. Everyone knows that “Lefties” are just gay-abortion-loving swingers who are all too touchy-feely to give their kids a good wallop when they deserve it. At least that’s what Hunter thinks, right?
It's a good thing you don't make sweeping generalizations, Hunter, because that would just be lazy and wrong.
P.S. I see that Johnathon's comments are still sitting there in all their mouthbreathing glory - how proud you must be.
Actually Paladiea, no one has bothered to comment on my post. Do you like the picture of the cut up baby?
I didn't see a cut up baby. I saw a picture of a baby wearing baby clothes, and then I saw a picture of an aborted fetus, which is NOT a baby.
Why don't you tell us how you like pictures of animals being made into food?
You lefties try to change the tune, and ignore the real issue, baby killing.
It is not baby killing. Nobody is advocating infanticide. You are the one trying to claim aborting fetuses and embryos is the same as killing live born babies. It is not.
If you don't like my blog, stop reading it!
You never tire of this kind of whining do you?
But like a good little Dawg follower, you run around after him/her praising all things Dawg.
Arf!
Grow up. Learn to attack the issues, not the people stating opinions.
Nice contrast, attacking someone while telling them not to attack others.
Dawg wants me to remove a comment because he/she doesn't agree with their point of view,
Where does Dawg say this?
too bad we still have freedom of speech in this country right?
Oh, he didn't. You just wanted to segue into your free speech martyr routine.
Wrong, I have deleted no comments, much as you lefties would like me to.
Morgentaler will soon be facing his judgement day, and I'm pretty sure that killing thousands of babies is not going to open up the pearly gates for him.
Well Dawg, you should care what sex I am, because as a woman my rights trump the rights of the unborn babies that get slaughtered in the womb. Because I have a womb, I deserve to be listened to more than you. You are powerless to stop me from doing what I want to my baby. And if you are a male, you better NOT comment on my opinion on abortion, you are NOT allowed to interfer with my choice, my body!
As a male, you have no right to disagree with my position, you should just shut up because it's my choice, my body. Or so the feminists tell us.
Well, this is one female who is totally disgusted with other females who kill their babies, and expect me, as a female, to agree with that killing.
You can call that picture of baby body parts anything you want, but those body parts are still the remains of what would have been a beautiful baby. To equate killing a cow for food with killing a human baby shows how ridiculous your arguments have become.
Abortion is baby killing.
"The Governor General is a disgrace to our country by appointing Morgentaler to the Order of Canada. I hope Wayne Gretzky, and others, return their medals in protest."
The GG does not pick the receipients you insipid half wit.
"I forgot to mention that Michelle Jean is a foreigner and also a disgrace to our country."
WTF was that?!
Our current GG is a very fine woman, who presents the Regal Personage well and with a character and charisma that this troop, and many troops admire in our Commander in Chief.
If this had of been said in this pressence in person, there would have been all bloody hell to pay.
White hood wearing inbred fool, thinking that "I hate this country more than I hate the taliban." Well, good on ya, move the f*** out of my country you racist douchebag!
Wrong, I have deleted no comments, much as you lefties would like me to.
Very well, I see that you haven't after all. I concede the point. But that brings up another. Why didn't you address Crabgrasses comment?
Morgentaler will soon be facing his judgement day, and I'm pretty sure that killing thousands of babies is not going to open up the pearly gates for him.
As an atheist, I don't know what you're talking about.
As a male, you have no right to disagree with my position, you should just shut up because it's my choice, my body. Or so the feminists tell us.
Indeed, however once you start talking about other women's bodies, all is fair comment. So how bout you keep your hands off mine k?
You can call that picture of baby body parts anything you want, but those body parts are still the remains of what would have been a beautiful baby. To equate killing a cow for food with killing a human baby shows how ridiculous your arguments have become.
I can show you a picture of me eating a sunflower seed. Will you also lament over the loss of the sunflower.
Anyhow that's beside the point, what would you do with all the unwanted children that a ban on abortion would cause?
Do you think that condemning a child to a life of misery is a better fate than aborting it before it achieves consciousness?
Okay, when someone goes into a coma, we can kill them? Is that what you are saying? If someone passes out drunk, they have lost consciousness, so it's okay to cut them up into pieces because they won't feel it?
Stupid, irrational arguments that still don't make it right to kill a baby. What do you think is going to come out of a woman's womb, a cow???
There is no justification in this day of "progressiveness" for baby killing, yet you lefties want to save the baby seals, but butcher human babies. And lulu, suck it up toots, if the shoe fits!!
Okay, when someone goes into a coma, we can kill them? Is that what you are saying? If someone passes out drunk, they have lost consciousness, so it's okay to cut them up into pieces because they won't feel it?
Now you're being silly. They're living things on their own and using no one elses body to survive. The second some drunk starts trying to sober up using my liver, I have the right to remove myself from the situation. That is exactly what terminating a pregnancy is. A woman denying a fetus access to her body.
Stupid, irrational arguments that still don't make it right to kill a baby. What do you think is going to come out of a woman's womb, a cow???
And stupid, irrational arguments don't give you the right to deny bodily autonomy to women.
There is no justification in this day of "progressiveness" for baby killing, yet you lefties want to save the baby seals, but butcher human babies. And lulu, suck it up toots, if the shoe fits!
There's plenty of justification. But since you're so adamant to deny women their bodily autonomy, does that mean that I can send some diabetics your way? They need to use your kidneys.
Hunter, the half witted, moronic arguements I am hearing from you on this issue does not give me a warm fuzzy about votiung conservative.
Thankfully, you are the vocal idiocracy, as opposed to the thinking silent majority.
So, tell me Hunter. How many children have you adopted?
What of children born of rape? Incest?
Children born into families that can not afford? (Birth control is not 100%, and not everyone is a Catholic).
I am not 100% for "choice", but neither am I 100% against it. You are apparently incapable of making a convincing arguement, beyond employing straw man attack against someone who is not even involved in the debate.
Wrong, I have deleted no comments, much as you lefties would like me to.
That's the second time today you have claimed others want you do delete comments.
Why are you so fixated on the idea that others want you to delete comments? Does it make you feel more important? Does it make you feel like a martyr, "speaking your truth" against so much imagined adversity? Do your pearls need more clutching?
Morgentaler will soon be facing his judgement day, and I'm pretty sure that killing thousands of babies is not going to open up the pearly gates for him.
That would be great if his only judgment was before God. But it seems some of your ilk think God is too weak and needs to be helped by your terrorists.
Just keep the legal system out of it for those of us still on Earth.
Well Dawg, you should care what sex I am, because as a woman my rights trump the rights of the unborn babies that get slaughtered in the womb.
No, your rights trump only those fetuses that are in your womb, not anyone else's.
Because I have a womb, I deserve to be listened to more than you.
Yes, when it comes to your womb.
You are powerless to stop me from doing what I want to my baby.
No, there are laws against harming a baby. But a fetus in your womb is your business.
And if you are a male, you better NOT comment on my opinion on abortion, you are NOT allowed to interfer with my choice, my body!
Doesn't matter if someone is a male or not, only you can decide what to do with your womb or anything in it.
As a male, you have no right to disagree with my position, you should just shut up because it's my choice, my body. Or so the feminists tell us.
Doesn't matter if it is a male or not. You control your own womb.
Well, this is one female who is totally disgusted with other females who kill their babies, and expect me, as a female, to agree with that killing.
Now you want to control other peoples' wombs. Didn't you just get through stating that it's your choice, your body? Why are you being expected to agree with what other people do with their wombs and fetuses. It's none of your business.
You can call that picture of baby body parts anything you want,
I'm sure I can, seems like you call it whatever you like, you call it a baby.
but those body parts are still the remains of what would have been a beautiful baby.
Had everything gone right, it would continue to grow. It might be an ugly baby, but once born it is a legal individual.
To equate killing a cow for food with killing a human baby shows how ridiculous your arguments have become.
Nobody equated anything to killing a human baby. A comparison was made between killing animals and killing a human embryo or fetus. The comparison pointed out that all kinds of body parts pictures can be taken of the animals that go into the food you eat.
Abortion is baby killing.
No, it is not.
I thought the emotional arguments were what the left uses against the logic of the right wing. I see I was mistaken. Your entire argument is based on emotion.
And lulu, suck it up toots, if the shoe fits!!
*yawn*
If these spittle-flecked, half-witted, misogynistic rants are your version of intelligent arguments, Hunter, it's no wonder Johnathon feels right at home here ...
Well excuse me for getting emotional about baby killing. It just makes me sick to my stomach when I see people trying to justify killing a living human being with useless statements like "it a woman's body", "it's a woman's choice".
Try keeping your legs closed until you are in a stable relationship. Lulu, honey, are you one of the swingers who have no moral values? Or have you maybe had an abortion and now have to justify it by saying it's okay to kill babies up to nine months olds.
Well excuse me for getting emotional about baby killing.
Maybe if you called it what it is, fetus killing, instead of what it is not, you wouldn't be so overwrought.
Fact remains, you sneer at anyone who opposes you as being "just emotional".
It just makes me sick to my stomach when I see people trying to justify killing a living human being with useless statements like "it a woman's body", "it's a woman's choice".
Nobody is trying to justify anything. They just don't believe that the legal system should be recognizing a legal individual until they are born.
Try keeping your legs closed until you are in a stable relationship.
Great idea. But rapists prefer that there be no abortion at all. That way they can victimize their prey forever, and they get to reproduce.
Why do you support rapists?
Lulu, honey, are you one of the swingers who have no moral values?
I'm sure you live too far away for any swinging with Lulu. And you're not her type.
Or have you maybe had an abortion and now have to justify it by saying it's okay to kill babies up to nine months olds.
No, you can't kill a baby at all. Right from birth, killing a baby is murder. A fetus in the womb is not a legally recognized individual.
Legal life begins at birth.
This creepy bastard and Order of Canada holder touched my toast and nobody demanded Wayne Gretzky suffer for his sins.
What's worser? I ask you.
and "family viewed sites" should not be posting pictures of american coins smeared by menstrual blood.
Well excuse me for getting emotional about baby killing. It just makes me sick to my stomach when I see people trying to justify killing a living human being with useless statements like "it a woman's body", "it's a woman's choice".
It is a woman's choice. If you're so keen on telling me what I can do with my body I can tell you what to do with yours. And I think I want your bone marrow for kids with cancer. You can always grow more :P
Try keeping your legs closed until you are in a stable relationship. Lulu, honey, are you one of the swingers who have no moral values? Or have you maybe had an abortion and now have to justify it by saying it's okay to kill babies up to nine months olds.
How bout you try and not tell people what to do all the time. It usually works out for the best.
Lulu, honey, are you one of the swingers who have no moral values? Or have you maybe had an abortion and now have to justify it by saying it's okay to kill babies up to nine months olds.
Ahhhh, the so-called civility of the sex-obsessed, hypocritical Right.
Hunter, sweetie, darling, cupcake ... you really need to get your nose out of other people's lives and relax. Seriously.
Maybe you should consider yoga - it's very soothing.
Sheena, so it's okay to abort babies but a Conservative Senator better not be caught with his pants down, although it's okay for Rae to bare his bottom on national tv. Sex is worse than abortion? Give your head a shake.
You are truly sickening, you see a picture of baby body parts and call it a sham??? Open your eyes, quit trying to justify murder as a woman's right. These women are so stupid they can't remember to take the pill everyday?
And using rape as a reason for abortion is just plain stupid. If one percent of women get raped, how many of them will also get pregnant? But I get taunted for being emotional when you lefties use the most emotional reason of all, rape. What hypocrites you are, but you don't even see it do you??
Lulu, honey, are you one of the swingers who have no moral values?
LuLu's more than capable of answering for herself so I don't presume to speak for her.
...but speaking for myself, wouldn't Vic Toews more closely fit that description?
Historically, birth was not necessarily viewed as a transition to life. Common law in England presumed that a child was born dead. According to early Jewish law, an infant was not deemed viable until it was thirty days old. During the 1950s the chief rabbi of Israel, Ben Zion Uziel, said that if an infant who was not yet thirty days old was killed, the killer could not be executed because the infant's life was still in doubt. In Japan, a child was not considered to be a human being until it released its first cry, a sign that the spirit entered its body. Scientists and ethicists continue to disagree about when life begins, fueling the moral debate surrounding abortion and infanticide. The twenty-first-century moral philosopher Michael Tooley contends that neonates are not persons and as such neonaticide should not be classified as murder. Tooley has suggested that infanticide should be allowed during a brief (e.g., thirty-day) period after birth.
http://www.deathreference.com/Ho-Ka/Infanticide.html
And now that we know that the brain isn't fully formed until the age of 20 or so, just think of the possibilities.
Chillax, Hunter, baby. Trust me. I ain't no leftie. They'll have no part of me.
And no.. Sex is not worser than abortion. Last I heard, sex caused abortion. Even more reason for it to be banned. Totally. Completely.
Some liberals continue to support the depraved act of sex after marriage, but I do not!
Won't someone please think of the children?
"Try keeping your legs closed until you are in a stable relationship."
Try minding your own business and keeping your nose out of other peoples' sex lives. It's an unhealthy obsession, and no good can come of it.
Geez Hunter relax. I fear that your stress level is through the roof. You'll live longer if you take a few deep breaths and relax a bit.
Fine jj, just don't expect me to pay for your abortion because you were too stupid to take the pill.
What about me? The pill makes me sick. I'm allergic to latex. I'm allergic to spermicide. IUDs give me screaming horrific pain. I use NFP for birth control (I'm married), but do tell, if I get pregnant, do I have the baby and go on the welfare tit for the rest of our lives? Or do I do the responsible thing and have an abortion? Adoption isn't an option, because I'd lose my job if I got pregnant and tried to carry it. So again, back on welfare. And I *know* how much you guys hate the welfare.
Well, if the issue is that Hunter doesn't want to pay for JJ's abortion out of her GST eligible tampon tax, then why should *i* as a by-choice successful sperm avoiding female by obliged to pay for all of those bloody births by all those women too stupid to remember to take their pills?
Hunter, I don't thing jj's going to be making any babies anytime now or in the future.
Get a clue before you respond to people witth half-witted inanities.
Frank fink, you must know something about jj that I don't, but seeing as this is MY BLOG, not Rabble Babble, try making valid points about the issue.
try making valid points about the issue.
Ummmmm.. actually we've been waiting for you to do that.
So, you first. Then you might be surprised to find others doing the same.
Since it's YOUR BLOG and all.
Frank fink, I made my points with my blog post, you have not addressed anything I blogged about, all you did was attack me for some supposed misunderstanding about jj, whoever the heck she/he is, as if I care.
So do you like severed baby parts? That's a valid issue. Please respond and tell me why abortion is such a morally responsible choice for us women.
hunter...you have succeeded in attracting a few people who get very touchy when you discuss moral absolutes. They live in a world of moral relativism and will never accept that you find abortion wrong.
Several other bloggers have produced excellent posts on the award and abortion.
fenris at DMB
Joanee at Blue like me
Linda at the great pumpkin
just to name a few
bluetech
"just don't expect me to pay for your abortion because you were too stupid to take the pill."
like you have a choice in the matter....
KEvron
"Historically, birth was not necessarily viewed as a transition to life."
thanks for the feeble stab at ironic relativism, s. sadly, not relevant.
KEvron
"8 month old fetuses can be chopped up, and have their brains sucked out by a vacuum."
we also enjoy contests with the wishbones....
KEvron
"They live in a world of moral relativism and will never accept that you find abortion wrong."
and she'll never accept that abortion is a woman's rightful choice. see how that works?
KEvron
kevron, I will never accept that women are so stupid that they think killing their babies is okay, right or just.
I feel sorry for women who think killing their babies makes them more powerful. My body, my choice they yell, while they slaughter their own babies. Sad, sick, misguided women. They take no joy in their own lives so they kill their babies, for what?
Back in the sixties, young girls who got pregnant were often made to feel like outcasts, this is not the case today. With the pill, condoms, and the morning after pill, there is no excuse for an unwanted pregnancy, which leads me back to how stupid women are for thinking that abortion is a good birth control method.
Strong women will have the baby, weak women will abort the baby then expect all other women to agree with and even applaud their choice.
I will not.
"Lulu, honey, are you one of the swingers who have no moral values?"
i was going to ask the same question! if so, then KL5-8662. let it ring.
KEvron
heh. klondike five would be a cool name for a band.
"I will never accept that women are so stupid that they think killing their babies is okay, right or just."
good. you shouldn't.
"I feel sorry for women who think killing their babies makes them more powerful."
good. you should.
"My body, my choice they yell, while they slaughter their own babies."
sounds a lot like the pro-choice crowd, sans the infanticide.
"Sad, sick, misguided women."
the one's who slaughter their babies? i agree.
"They take no joy in their own lives so they kill their babies"
quite a remarkable conclusion.
"for what?"
you tell me? it's got to be either fun or profit.
"Back in the sixties, young girls who got pregnant were often made to feel like outcasts"
better than a stoning, i supose.
"this is not the case today."
that's progress for ya'.
"With the pill, condoms, and the morning after pill, there is no excuse for an unwanted pregnancy"
that's progress for ya'.
"which leads me back to how stupid women are for thinking that abortion is a good birth control method."
but earlier you said "I will never accept that women are so stupid that they think killing their babies is okay, right or just." you've outwitted us both!
"Strong women will have the baby, weak women will abort the baby"
sounds a tad darwinian.
"then expect all other women to agree with and even applaud their choice."
i'm okay with the applause, but i draw the line at tipping.
"I will not."
good. you shouldn't.
but i sorta knew all this about you already.
KEvron
Johnathon: "Grow up idiots."
I'm not inclined to grow up an idiot myself, but I will defend to the death your right to do so.
"...abortion is killing."
No. It's not.
How did this blog get mixed up with cdn cynic. Must be pick on Hunter day at cc. Funny that the comments from cc fanatics don't make any more sense here than they do there. Only thing missing is the foul language. Let them rant, and just refuse to respond. They are clueless and have no morals. At least for today they aren't attacking their usual targets. They to will go somewhere else.
Is it possible that polls show that woman are starting to turn to PMSH and the liberals have pulled this in an attempt to divide and conquer. Most women that support Harper are against abortion on demand, so this just might push more into our corner. Should we feel sorry for the GG, she will be dammed if she overturns this and dammed if she doesn't. Guess she knows she will never get reappointed at the end of her term. Cheers for that.
maryT: "Is it possible that polls show that woman are starting to turn to PMSH and the liberals have pulled this in an attempt to divide and conquer."
Um, no.
Okay, yes.
You're obviously onto us. The Liberals still control EVERYTHING, even though Steph Harper won the election. Anything that you see or hear from this point forward will have been carefully orchestrated by the Ivory Tower Latte-Sipping Elite®. Resistance is futile.
ps - Please don't tell too many people about this - it's supposed to be kept pretty quiet, if you know what I mean. Thanks in advance.
Yes, liberals do control the media, via their biased reporters, anchors and writers.
Why can't I ask a question or state my opinion on any topic.
And, yes, we are onto the liberals in their pathetic attempts to buy votes. Everything they do and say, from now on, will be under the microscope. We will spin it to our advantage, except we will be telling the truth.
Liberals hate women, belittle women, (but say they support them)
hate pregnant women, native women.
It is liberals who have voted against every attempt to improve the lives of the above.
I think the liberal theme song is when dion get defeated, so long it's been good to know you. (not)
And, by the way libbloggers are coming over from the dark side to see what is going on, we must be scareing them big time.
Mary, Liberals hate pregnant women and native women? I didn't realize that. You're telling the truth,right?
By the way, what do you have against Michaëlle Jean?
Liberals are against Epp's bill and have voted against giving native women protection of the Charter. See how educated you can get by reading conservative blogs, and all without foul language.
Where did I say I was against the GG. I will say she has better taste in clothes than AC did. And she did not have to get married to accept the post like AC did.
Another example of liberals hating women is their treatment of Jennifer, who thinks she might have to re-brand her company. Big Bully Dion.
Mary, when you wrote, regarding Michaëlle Jean: "Guess she knows she will never get reappointed at the end of her term. Cheers for that."
Doesn't that suggest that you don't like her much?
If you think that not supporting C-484 is equivalent to hating pregnant women, then you, with all due respect, are insane. Is that what you think? It's a bit more involved than you might realize, unless you're being willfully simple-minded about it.
I'm not sure what you're referring to with respect to native women and the Charter. If it's going to be a case of you being anywhere near as disingenuous as your stated position on C-484, don't trouble yourself providing me with details.
And if you think that Harper behaves like a gentleman and Dion like a bully, call the nurse at once.
Anon 3:06, MaryT made it clear that the GG is stuck between a rock and a hard place with the killers award. Guess what, she's a weak woman who runs to the PM anytime things get tough, like when people aren't just admiring her outfits. She's pretty, but brainless.
A Supreme judge has forced this order of Canada on ALL of Canada because of her feminist agenda. She is a blight to all people who respect motherhood, and hate baby killing.
Let me be very clear, abortion kills babies, call those parts anything you want to justify your opinion, but the women who get those abortions know they are killing a baby. In this day of the "progressives" why do they need to kill their babies anymore?
As far as aboriginal rights, why didn't all lefty parties support the Conservatives so that all women are covered under your precious Charter of Rights? Why did you fight so hard to keep the age of consent at 14? Perverts, aboriginal women's rights deniers, and baby killers. Nice bunch you are.
Just for the sake of clarity, is a "lefty" anyone who doesn't like Stephen Harper?
If not, how do you collectively refer to the others who don't like him?
As a "lefty" from way back, I like Steven Harper. A lefty is someone who writes with their left hand.
Post a Comment